2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.cropro.2014.04.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth and weed suppression ability of common and new cover crops in Germany

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

6
67
1
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
6
67
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In all the monitored years, the highest values of soil coverage were recorded for Sinapis alba L. Sinapis alba L. and Phacelia tanacetifolia Bentham were the least sensitive to different temperature and rainfall conditions. Both catch crops not only produced higher yields but also sufficient soil coverage, which also agrees with findings of Brust et al (2014) and Ramírez-García et al (2015). Fagopyrum esculentum Moench was characterised by a rapid and aggressive start as well as strong plant coverage in the beginning of the growing season, and also reached higher yields of dry matter, as also stated by Clark (2008), Brust et al (2014) and Ziech et al (2015).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In all the monitored years, the highest values of soil coverage were recorded for Sinapis alba L. Sinapis alba L. and Phacelia tanacetifolia Bentham were the least sensitive to different temperature and rainfall conditions. Both catch crops not only produced higher yields but also sufficient soil coverage, which also agrees with findings of Brust et al (2014) and Ramírez-García et al (2015). Fagopyrum esculentum Moench was characterised by a rapid and aggressive start as well as strong plant coverage in the beginning of the growing season, and also reached higher yields of dry matter, as also stated by Clark (2008), Brust et al (2014) and Ziech et al (2015).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Both catch crops not only produced higher yields but also sufficient soil coverage, which also agrees with findings of Brust et al (2014) and Ramírez-García et al (2015). Fagopyrum esculentum Moench was characterised by a rapid and aggressive start as well as strong plant coverage in the beginning of the growing season, and also reached higher yields of dry matter, as also stated by Clark (2008), Brust et al (2014) and Ziech et al (2015). In some years, its lower yields and low soil coverage can be explained by higher sensitivity to the irregular distribution of rainfall and low ground temperatures that prematurely end its growth so Fagopyrum esculentum Moench loses the ability to cover the soil.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The most effective weed control efficacy was achieved by treatments 3 WBH and 5 WBH with up to 91, 84, 83 and 86, 90, 85% on monocotyledons, dicotyledons and volunteer wheat compared to NCC at 12 WAH, respectively (Figure 2). Effective weed density reductions by fall-sown cover crops of up to 42-68% were demonstrated by several similar studies (Silva 2014Brust et al (2014) reported weed density suppression by 98% after oilseed radish cultivation. Fertilization effects.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…winter crops) have several beneficial effects on agricultural fields (Kunz et al 2016), including the weed suppression (Brust et al 2014, Jabran et al 2015 provided, among other reasons, by the release of allelopathic substances from cover crops and/or crop residues (Farooq et al 2011) into the soil via leachates or root exudates, or by decomposition of plant biomass (Bonanomi et al 2006). The allelopathic substances (e.g.…”
Section: Highlighted Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%