Growth and survival of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) fry given diets supplemented with fish protein hydrolysate and lactic acid bacteria during a challenge trial with Aeromonas salmonicida

Gildberg, Asbjørn; Johansen, Audny; Bøgwald, Jarl

doi:10.1016/0044-8486(95)01144-7

Cited by 145 publications

(96 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…FPH (hydrolyzing pollock, Theragra chalcogramma with Flavourzy me and Alcalase), immun ity of large yellow croaker (Lari michthys crocear) can be upregulated. The immune enhancement effect of fish protein hydrolysates may be related to the small and mediu msized peptides (500-3,000 Da) (Gildberg, Johansen, & Bøgwald , 1995). Bøgwald, Dalmo, Leifson, Stenberg, & Gildberg (1996) and Gildberg et al (1995) demonstrated that the non-specific defense system of fish can be stimu lated by small and mediu m-sized peptides fro m fish protein hydrolysate.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The immune enhancement effect of fish protein hydrolysates may be related to the small and mediu msized peptides (500-3,000 Da) (Gildberg, Johansen, & Bøgwald , 1995). Bøgwald, Dalmo, Leifson, Stenberg, & Gildberg (1996) and Gildberg et al (1995) demonstrated that the non-specific defense system of fish can be stimu lated by small and mediu m-sized peptides fro m fish protein hydrolysate. AKP and ACP are marker en zy mes of lysosome macrophages in the immune system of shrimp and are important indices of immune function and health.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Untitled

Li¹,

Zhang²,

Song³

et al. 2018

Turk. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Supplemental effects of low-molecular-weight fish hydrolysate (LWFH) was investigated in high soybean meal (HSM ) diets fed to Litopenaeus vannamei (0.44 ± 0.03 g) for 48 days. The HSM diet, containing 15% fish meal and 47% soybean meal, was supplemented with 0, 5, 10, 15 or 20 g kg -1LWFH (HSM 0, HSM 5, HSM 10, HSM 15 and HSM 20). LWFH significantly (P < 0.05) improved growth and the highest growth was found in HSM 15. Feed intake significantly increased at ≥ 10 g kg -1LWFH, and the lowest feed conversion ratio was observed in H SM 10 group. Shrimp survival significantly increased at ≥ 15 g kg -1LWFH compared to HSM 0 group. Significantly higher serum peroxidase, acid phosphatase and alkaline phosphatase activities were observed in HSM 20 group and total antioxidant capacity increased at ≥ 15 g kg -1LWFH. HSM 10 group exhibited significantly higher phenoloxidase activity than HSM 0, and superoxide dismutase activity enhanced in HSM 5 and HSM 10. Intestinal inflammatory genes expression assay showed the significant decrease of activating transcription factor 4 expression in HSM 15 group compared to HSM 0 group, and macrophage migration inhibitory factor expression decreased significantly at 5-15 g kg -1 LWFH. To conclude, 10-15 g kg -1 LWFH in HSM diet improves growth, antioxidant activity and innate immunity.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Untitled

Li¹,

Zhang²,

Song³

et al. 2018

Turk. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The adaptive immune system is poorly developed in early developmental stages of fish (Schrøder et al, 1998;Grøntvedt and Espelid, 2003), which is why immunostimulants and probiotics have been used in an attempt to increase survival of larvae against microbial pathogens (Gildberg et al 1995;Gildberg and Mikkelsen, 1998;Nikoskelainen et al, 2001). In this respect, alginate has been proposed as a potential candidate.…”

Section: Bioactive Alginate (High-m Alginate)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Criteria for Safe Use of Plant Ingredients in Diets for Aquacultured Fish

Hemre

Amlund

Aursand

et al. 2018

EJNFS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Performing an in vitro antagonism test is considered to be an important step in screening potential probiotics, in which pathogenic bacteria are exposed to the selective probiotics in liquid (Gildberg, et al, 1995(Gildberg, et al, , 1997 or solid (Austin et al, 1992;Dopazo, et al, 1988;Westerdahl et al, 1990) medium. The preselection of candidate probiotics based on these in vitro antagonism tests has usually led to the finding of effective probiotics (Verschuere et al, 2000).…”

Section: Screening Isolation and In Vitro Antagonism Test Of Autochtmentioning

confidence: 99%