2005
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.92.4.682
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth and photosynthetic responses of the federally endangered shrub, Lindera melissifolia (Lauraceae), to varied light environments

Abstract: Photosynthetic, morphological, and growth responses to light environment can be useful measurements to determine favorable habitat conditions for the conservation of endangered species. For Lindera melissifolia (Walt.) Blume, we compared morphological and photosynthetic responses under natural and controlled light regimes, and growth under three light treatments: 100%, 42%, and 19% full sunlight. Typical sun-shade morphological responses to decreasing light levels included decreased stomatal density, increased… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

12
74
1
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(59 reference statements)
12
74
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These traits indicate that shade plants invest more in the production of large leaves with thin mesophyll, which produces a leaf structure that is more efficient in light capture (Boardman, 1977;Souza et al, 2009). High LAR values in shade plants indicate a substantial investment in vegetative organs responsible for the capture of limiting light resources (Aleric & Kirkman, 2005;Gordon, 1969). Also, the low leaf number in shade plants indicates a high investment in leaf size, rather than in leaf number.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These traits indicate that shade plants invest more in the production of large leaves with thin mesophyll, which produces a leaf structure that is more efficient in light capture (Boardman, 1977;Souza et al, 2009). High LAR values in shade plants indicate a substantial investment in vegetative organs responsible for the capture of limiting light resources (Aleric & Kirkman, 2005;Gordon, 1969). Also, the low leaf number in shade plants indicates a high investment in leaf size, rather than in leaf number.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…radiata under 85% shade and by Endres et al (2010) in T. chrysotricha seedlings, especially under 95% shade. In Lindera melissifolia, however, the highest photosynthetic rates were observed when the plants were grown under 58% shade; yet, when irradiance was reduced by 81% (shading) net/liquid photosynthesis decreased significantly (Aleric & Kirkman, 2005).…”
Section: In Caesalpinia Pyramidalismentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Measurements of photosynthetic and morphological responses to light may reveal the tolerance of species to light intensity and have been useful in agriculture, ecology, forestry and horticulture (Aleric & Kirkman, 2005). Efficient photosynthetic activity is necessary for the high production of plant biomass.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, researches are being carried out to obtain information about ecological responses of rare and endangered plants under elevated CO 2 and temperature (Kim and You 2010;Shin et al 2012;Han et al 2012), but unfortunately there is still a lack of studies on their biological and ecological responses under climate change situations (Aleric and Kirkman 2005). Moreover, there has been no study that tried to determine the effects of elevated CO 2 and temperature on changes in foliage biochemistry of various rare and endangered plants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%