1982
DOI: 10.2134/agronj1982.00021962007400040026x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth and N Fixation of Some Tropical Forage Legumes as Influenced by Solar Radiation Regimes1

Abstract: Decreased solar radiation due to cloud cover or shading by plantation crops or associatedass can severely limit the production of tropical forage legumes. We therefore evaluated the response of six legumes (three replicated and three not replicated) to four radiation regimes (100, 70, 45, and 27% of unshaded solar radiation, hereafter termed "full sun") with polypropylene netting in the field. The three replicated legumes had significant yield reductions at 27% full sun, with intermediate reductions at 70 and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0
1

Year Published

1984
1984
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results for these annual legumes with determinate flowering constrast with those obtained with six tropical forage legumes of indeterminate-flowering in Hawaii where at 27% full light only one species even flowered [7]. Flowering of indeterminate-flowering legumes is much more affected by shading than forage production [5].…”
Section: Edible Bean Harvestmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results for these annual legumes with determinate flowering constrast with those obtained with six tropical forage legumes of indeterminate-flowering in Hawaii where at 27% full light only one species even flowered [7]. Flowering of indeterminate-flowering legumes is much more affected by shading than forage production [5].…”
Section: Edible Bean Harvestmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Results of an experiment testing forage legumes under different shading levels [7] suggest that differences in shade tolerance between forage legumes are maintained at different light levels, i.e. a good performer at 25% full light will also perform well at 70% light.…”
Section: Species Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O incremento da % de Ca +2 não é estimulado pela luminosidade (ERIKSEN;WHITNEY, 1982), no entanto, este estudo a % de Ca +2 apresentou influência dos níveis crescentes de sombreamento tanto na fração folha como na fração haste, nos dois períodos de avaliação. O que corrobora com Belsky (1992) A relação folha/haste das leguminosas forrageiras tropicais apresentou efeito linear negativo em função do nível de sombreamento (0, 30, 50 e 70% de retenção luminosa) durante o verão e outono, onde foi observado decréscimo médio de 0,2% na relação folha/haste para cada nível de sombreamento estudado em ambas estações.…”
Section: Espécieunclassified
“…leucocephala increases its leaf area in low growth PPFD as would a facultative shade plant. L. leucocepha is considered to be shade tolerant because it has a relatively small decline in yield under shaded conditions as compared to other tropical forest legumes [6,7]. Potential physiological causes for this shade tolerance were explored in the present study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hawaiian Giant L. leucocephala (cv K8) is a particularly useful cultivar because of its high yield [5]. Since L. leucocephala is planted in shaded areas such as under crops, information on its response to shade is potentially useful for optimizing yield [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%