2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ehb.2017.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth and maturity: A quantitative systematic review and network analysis in anthropometric history

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent decades, anthropometric measurements have become consolidated in the field of social science as alternative or complementary indicators to the classic indicators for analysing the different aspects of human well-being. Specifically, adult height is a widely accepted proxy of the nutritional health and biological standard of living of populations and economic history studies in particular have incorporated this dimension of human well-being in their contemplation of living conditions of past populations and their underlying factors (e.g., income, diet, physical effort or the burden of disease) (Steckel 1995;Fogel 2004;Deaton 2007;Bozzoli et al 2009;Komlos and Kelly 2016;Galofré-Vilà 2018). These factors affect the growth cycle in a cumulative manner from pre-natal life to adulthood as they condition the degree to which the genetically established anthropometric potential of each individual is reached (Bogin 2001;Silventoinen 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent decades, anthropometric measurements have become consolidated in the field of social science as alternative or complementary indicators to the classic indicators for analysing the different aspects of human well-being. Specifically, adult height is a widely accepted proxy of the nutritional health and biological standard of living of populations and economic history studies in particular have incorporated this dimension of human well-being in their contemplation of living conditions of past populations and their underlying factors (e.g., income, diet, physical effort or the burden of disease) (Steckel 1995;Fogel 2004;Deaton 2007;Bozzoli et al 2009;Komlos and Kelly 2016;Galofré-Vilà 2018). These factors affect the growth cycle in a cumulative manner from pre-natal life to adulthood as they condition the degree to which the genetically established anthropometric potential of each individual is reached (Bogin 2001;Silventoinen 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After four decades of research in anthropometric history, the use of human stature to measure changes in standards of living and inequality has become widespread among economic historians (Blum, 2013; Galofré-Vilà, 2018). In close collaboration with economists, physical anthropologists and biologists, economic historians have shown that stature and other bodily measures, such as weight, robustness, and corporal mass, have been influenced by environmental and socio-economic determinants over long periods of time and across different geographies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, over the last 30 years anthropometric historians have studied well-being through changes in heights (for a systematic review of the literature see Galofré-Vilà 2017). Although the main causes of variation in individual height may be genetic, it has long been recognised that variations in the mean heights of different groups of people owe much to economic, social and environmental circumstances.…”
Section: Measuring Wellbeing Over the Very Long-runmentioning
confidence: 99%