2017
DOI: 10.5935/1806-6690.20170088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth and gas exchange in cowpea plants under different managements and saline conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
7

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
6
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Other studies, however, have found contrary results, with improvement in the WUE of some ornamental species under water deficit conditions due to possible acclimation to the lack of water, related to an efficient adaptation of the stomatal control over photosynthesis, maintaining CO 2 assimilation proportionally higher than the loss of water by the stomata (Álvarez et al, 2011). When plants are subjected to water stress, there is a reduction in stomatal opening as a protective measure, and consequently a reduction in the CO 2 influx in the substomatal chamber (Nascimento et al, 2011;Silva et al, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other studies, however, have found contrary results, with improvement in the WUE of some ornamental species under water deficit conditions due to possible acclimation to the lack of water, related to an efficient adaptation of the stomatal control over photosynthesis, maintaining CO 2 assimilation proportionally higher than the loss of water by the stomata (Álvarez et al, 2011). When plants are subjected to water stress, there is a reduction in stomatal opening as a protective measure, and consequently a reduction in the CO 2 influx in the substomatal chamber (Nascimento et al, 2011;Silva et al, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Water use efficiency (WUE) was determined as a function of cowpea grain yield, calculated as the ratio between grain yield and total water depth used in each treatment, according to Souza et al (2011), with values expressed in kg ha -1 mm -1 . Yield and WUE data were subjected to regression analysis and the significances of the generated equations were checked based on F test, considering them as valid if above 0.05 probability, as in the studies of Bastos et al (2012) and Silva et al (2017).…”
Section: Materials Amethodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O feijão-caupi (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) é uma das principais espécies de importância socioeconômica para as Regiões Norte e Nordeste do Brasil, devido seu papel em sistemas de produção agrícola e pelos teores de proteínas (25%) e carboidratos (58%) contidos em seus grãos, que são de importância para a alimentação humana (BARROS et al, 2013;SILVA et al, 2017;RIOS et al, 2018). Segundo dados da Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento, na safra 2017/2018 foram produzidas 789,8 mil toneladas de feijão-caupi no país, tendo sido os Estados de Mato Grosso, Ceará, Bahia e Piauí responsáveis por 30,0; 14,6; 12,7 e 11,8% da produção nacional, respectivamente (CONAB, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Aos 28 dias após o início dos tratamentos (≈ 64° DAS, estádio R9) e na presença de deficiência hídrica cumulativa, foram realizadas medidas das taxas de fotossíntese (A), condutância estomática (gs) e concentração interna de CO 2 (Ci) com um analisador de gás infravermelho portátil (IRGA), de sistema aberto, modelo 6400XT (LI-COR, Inc.) semelhante ao trabalho de Silva et al (2017). Foram coletadas duas amostras por tratamento entre 8 e 11 h, no folíolo central da terceira ou quarta folha contadas a partir do ápice, com bom estado fitossanitário e completamente expandidas sob uma intensidade luminosa artificial de 1.500 μmol m -2 s -1 , concentração de CO 2 de 400 μmol mol -1 , e condições naturais de temperatura e umidade relativa.…”
Section: Methodsunclassified
“…Os dados de produtividade foram submetidos à análise de variância e as médias comparadas pelo teste de Tukey a 5% de probabilidade, utilizando o programa SAS v. 9.2 (SAS®, North Carolina State University). Realizou-se analise de regressão e as significâncias das equações geradas foram verificadas com base no teste F, considerando-as válidas desde que fossem superiores a 95% de probabilidade (Silva et al, 2017).…”
Section: Methodsunclassified