1986
DOI: 10.1080/00207284.1986.11491452
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Group Therapy: A Treatment of Choice for Young Victims of Child Abuse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
2

Year Published

1990
1990
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The hypothesized advantages of group over other modalities has not been empirically tested. Reported benefits of group treatment include (a) a reduced sense of social isolation and sense of being "different," (b) an opportunity to learn different patterns of interaction with other children and adults, (c) cost-effectiveness, (d) positive social pressure and modeling from peers in the group, (e) experiencing positive interactions and receiving feedback from peers, and (f) the ability to more readily assess the children's social perceptions and skills (Finkelhor, 1984;Friedrich, 1996;Reeker, Ensing, & Elliott, 1997;Silovsky, 2005;Stark, Swearer, Kurowski, Sommer, & Bowen, 1996;Steward, Farguhar, Dicharry, & Glick, 1986).…”
Section: Treatment Modalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hypothesized advantages of group over other modalities has not been empirically tested. Reported benefits of group treatment include (a) a reduced sense of social isolation and sense of being "different," (b) an opportunity to learn different patterns of interaction with other children and adults, (c) cost-effectiveness, (d) positive social pressure and modeling from peers in the group, (e) experiencing positive interactions and receiving feedback from peers, and (f) the ability to more readily assess the children's social perceptions and skills (Finkelhor, 1984;Friedrich, 1996;Reeker, Ensing, & Elliott, 1997;Silovsky, 2005;Stark, Swearer, Kurowski, Sommer, & Bowen, 1996;Steward, Farguhar, Dicharry, & Glick, 1986).…”
Section: Treatment Modalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ItTan also address the sense of isolation and stigma experiend by the sexually abused child (Knittle and Turn, 1980;Carozza and Hekteiner, 1982;Berliner and Emst, 1984;Wolf, 19931, and for those from dysfunctiod or abusive families, the interaction with their peers in the presence of two thoughtful and nurturing therapists can provide an experience of a surrogate, healthy family (Steward et al, 1986;deYoung and Corbin, 1994). For adolescents, distrust of adults and authority figures can also contraindicate individual therapy, while interaction with a peer group is acceptable (Knittle and Tuana, 1980).…”
Section: Individual and Group Therapymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…As group therapy avoids replicating the potential imbalance of power of the individual relationship, some clinicians recommend it as the primary intervention in the treatment of sexual abuse (Knittle and Tuana, 1980;Steward et al, 1986). ItTan also address the sense of isolation and stigma experiend by the sexually abused child (Knittle and Turn, 1980;Carozza and Hekteiner, 1982;Berliner and Emst, 1984;Wolf, 19931, and for those from dysfunctiod or abusive families, the interaction with their peers in the presence of two thoughtful and nurturing therapists can provide an experience of a surrogate, healthy family (Steward et al, 1986;deYoung and Corbin, 1994).…”
Section: Individual and Group Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individual, family, and group therapy have been among the approaches most commonly employed (Forseth & Brown, 1981). While each method of intervention may be viewed as beneficial to children experiencing sexual abuse, many clinicians (e.g., Berliner & Ernst, 1984; Carozza & Heirsteiner, 1982; Steward, Farquhar, Dicharry, Glick, & Martin, 1986) consider group therapy particularly effective for child abuse, calling it the "treatment of choice" (Steward et al, 1986, P. 263).…”
Section: Implications For Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%