2013
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2012.2772
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Group size adjustment to ecological demand in a cooperative breeder

Abstract: Environmental factors can determine which group size will maximize the fitness of group members. This is particularly important in cooperative breeders, where group members often serve different purposes. Experimental studies are yet lacking to check whether ecologically mediated need for help will change the propensity of dominant group members to accept immigrants. Here, we manipulated the perceived risk of predation for dominant breeders of the cooperatively breeding cichlid fish Neolamprologus pulcher to t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
45
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
2
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If in a natural context an intruder cannot monopolize its own shelter, the adequate response is to submit towards other shelter owners (Taborsky ; Zöttl et al . ). The latter are then willing to tolerate the subordinate fish close to the shelter (Taborsky et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…If in a natural context an intruder cannot monopolize its own shelter, the adequate response is to submit towards other shelter owners (Taborsky ; Zöttl et al . ). The latter are then willing to tolerate the subordinate fish close to the shelter (Taborsky et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Studies investigating pay-to-stay focused mainly on predictions regarding behavioural responses of group members towards helpers not paying in accordance with need [13][14][15]17]. Others investigated how the tolerance of subordinates depends on the need for help [18,26], how helpers adjust their cooperative effort to alternative options [19,27], how dominant individuals benefit from subordinates [16] and if the amount of helping increases tolerance in the group [28]. Most studies have supported predictions derived from the pay-to-stay hypothesis (but see [16,28]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Synergy and discounting generate non-linearities in the rate of return of the PG and hence reflect diminishing returns or economies of scale, which are common features of group interactions in biological and social systems [53,[86][87][88]. For example, in cooperative breeding cichlid fish the optimum breeding group size changes depending on the perceived environmental threats as compared to the potential benefits an additional member could provide to the group [89]. Additional members can dilute the risk of predation and/or actively take part in territory defence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%