Group Members' Self-Disclosure

Kangas, Jon

doi:10.1177/104649647100200107

Cited by 15 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For example, as a result of better supervisory relationship in a session, positive emotions in trainees may enhance their co-operation and decrease conflict in the group (Barsade, 2002), thereby leading to better perception of peer relationship. At the between-trainee level, trainees who perceive better working alliance with their supervisor may feel safer and disclose more (Gunn & Pistole; 2012; Mehr et al, 2015), which fosters disclosure among other group members and enhances peer relationships (Kangas, 1971). In the other direction, trainees who perceive better peer relationship may feel a greater sense of belonging to the group (McMillan & Chavis, 1986), which allows trainees to be more engaged in learning (Masika & Jones, 2016).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Does peer relationship matter? A multilevel investigation of the effects of peer and supervisory relationships on group supervision outcomes.

Chui¹,

Li²,

Luk³

2021

Journal of Counseling Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Research in clinical supervision has primarily focused on the contribution of supervisors to training outcome. However, peers may also play a significant role in trainees' development, particularly during group supervision. Fifty-three trainees from 10 supervision groups completed measures of peer relationship, supervisory working alliance (SWA), supervision satisfaction (SAT), and counseling self-efficacy (CSE) at three time points during a 20-week counseling practicum at a department clinic in Hong Kong. Multilevel modeling was conducted to test the hypothesis that both peer relationship and SWA contribute to SAT and CSE. The path model results showed that higher within-and between-trainee SWA was associated with higher SAT, and higher between-trainee SWA was associated with higher CSE. Better within-and between-trainee peer relationship was associated with higher CSE, but not with SAT. Thus, when peer relationship and SWA were entered as predictors into the same analysis and allowed to control for each other's effects, they each have unique contributions to the outcome of group supervision. Implications for training and supervision research are discussed. Public Significance StatementClinical training often takes place in groups. This study provides evidence that supervisors and peers have unique contributions to training outcomes in group supervision. This study lends support to the recommendation that when designing training programs, attention should be paid to the quality of peer relationships in addition to supervisory relationships.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Does peer relationship matter? A multilevel investigation of the effects of peer and supervisory relationships on group supervision outcomes.

Chui¹,

Li²,

Luk³

2021

Journal of Counseling Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The evaluation of group interventions using an objectively scored behavioral test of openness

Tittler

Hermann²

1980

J. Clin. Psychol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Group Test of Openness (GTO) is comprised of 24 behavioral items that represent, in equal numbers, three different levels of openness. Participants (N = 69) obtain a score by selecting to perform 6 items, which are summed in terms of their openness levels. The GTO was shown to have a moderate degree of stability. It does not appear to be highly reactive. Predictive validity was demonstrated through a 14‐week high school course in counseling skill in which scores on the GTO increased in the treatment group but not the control group. The advantage of the GTO over other measures of openness lies in its focus on behavior within a group and on its objective methozof scoring However, it is noted that any measure based on the openness value of specific behaviors may require recalibration for certain populations.

show abstract

Cotherapist modeling in group psychotherapy: Fact or fantasy?

McNary

Dies

1993

Group

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Group Members' Self-Disclosure

Cited by 15 publications

References 4 publications

Does peer relationship matter? A multilevel investigation of the effects of peer and supervisory relationships on group supervision outcomes.

Does peer relationship matter? A multilevel investigation of the effects of peer and supervisory relationships on group supervision outcomes.

The evaluation of group interventions using an objectively scored behavioral test of openness

Cotherapist modeling in group psychotherapy: Fact or fantasy?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About