Group-level group identity as a basis of a group.

Ozeki, Miki

doi:10.1037/gdn0000030

Cited by 8 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 42 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Recently, researchers have begun to untangle these two levels of analysis by treating social identification as a multilevel construct (Jans, Leach, Garcia, & Postmes, ; Ozeki, ). By decomposing observed individual responses into individual‐level and group‐level components, researchers have distinguished between effects that should be attributed to individual differences and processes and those that should be attributed to group‐level differences and processes.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…By decomposing observed individual responses into individual‐level and group‐level components, researchers have distinguished between effects that should be attributed to individual differences and processes and those that should be attributed to group‐level differences and processes. TLI (also described as ‘group‐level group identity’, Ozeki, ) refers to the variance in social identification that can be attributed to the team level. Treated in this way, TLI represents the emergent identity of the group or team, rather than the intrapsychic processes of each separate individual (i.e., ILI) (Khan et al ., ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Ozeki () found that TLI was an essential element in group formation and had a positive effect on interactions, emotional bonds, and interdependence among group members. Recent longitudinal multilevel analyses confirmed that identification is more than an individual difference and is, at least partly, based on group‐level processes (Jans et al ., ; Thomas et al ., ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Team‐level identification predicts perceived and actual team performance: Longitudinal multilevel analyses with sports teams

Thomas

Brown

Easterbrook

et al. 2018

British J Social Psychol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Social identification and team performance literatures typically focus on the relationship between individual differences in identification and individual‐level performance. By using a longitudinal multilevel approach, involving 369 members of 45 sports teams across England and Italy, we compared how team‐level and individual‐level variance in social identification together predicted team and individual performance outcomes. As hypothesized, team‐level variance in identification significantly predicted subsequent levels of both perceived and actual team performance in cross‐lagged analyses. Conversely, individual‐level variance in identification did not significantly predict subsequent levels of perceived individual performance. These findings support recent calls for social identity to be considered a multilevel construct and highlight the influence of group‐level social identification on group‐level processes and outcomes, over and above its individual‐level effects.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Team‐level identification predicts perceived and actual team performance: Longitudinal multilevel analyses with sports teams

Thomas

Brown

Easterbrook

et al. 2018

British J Social Psychol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…There are four types of groups: primary, social, collective, and category groups (Ozeki, ). Primary groups are small and long term and do not necessarily have goals and objectives, such as a family, while social groups are less tight‐knit and include work groups.…”

Section: Conceptual Approachmentioning

confidence: 99%

Social identity in MNCs based on language and nationality

Wöcke¹,

Grosse

Stacey

et al. 2017

Thunderbird Intl Bus Rev

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The existence of multiple languages in a multinational corporation (MNC) causes tensions in the firm both by causing problems in communicating and by creating social groups. MNCs that adopt a common corporate language that is not their home language will find a problem of competing languages. Nationality is another cultural feature that leads to perceived biases that favor home-country nationals. We explore both of these influences using social identity theory.Our research was conducted in a Spanish MNC that has subsidiaries in 42 countries and has adopted English as its corporate language. We used a mixed-method approach with a mailed survey of 216 managers across 42 subsidiaries in the MNC and personal interviews of headquarters executives. We found that Spanish speakers enjoyed advantages in terms of access to resources for themselves and their subsidiaries, relative to non-Spanish speakers. This access was greater when the Spanish speakers were Spanish nationals and was moderated by geographic proximity of the subsidiary to the headquarters and age of the subsidiary. K E Y W O R D Scorporate language, headquarters-subsidiary relationship, in-company resource allocation, language and IB, social identity

show abstract

“…Recent multilevel research indicates that individuals' identification with a group is not based solely on their personal representation of the group, but is also influenced by group-level processes (Jans, Leach, Garcia & Postmes, 2015). Thus, social identification is not simply an intrapsychic process of each separate individual but also an emergent property of the group as a whole (see also Ozeki, 2015). Seen thus, the motivated identity processes of group members may influence each other, leading to an emergent motivated identity process that occurs at the collective or group level and is "greater than the sum of its parts" (i.e.…”

Section: Social Identity Motives (Group Content Individual Processes)mentioning

confidence: 99%