Group Decision Procedure to Model the Dependency Structure of Complex Systems: Framework and Case Study for Critical Infrastructures

Abstract

This paper proposes a group decision framework to model the dependency structure of a complex system based on expert surveys. The proposed framework is designed to systematically populate a dependency matrix whose entry indicates the degree that its row element is influenced by its column element. The degree of dependency is assessed based on two different perspectives-of the influencing element and of the influenced element-and the assessments with the two perspectives are separately compiled and compared in the initial round survey. Entries with large assessment gaps are classified as discussion items and a group decision procedure to reduce the gaps in these items is applied in the consensus round survey. A case study for dependency modeling of critical infrastructures of South Korea was conducted using the proposed framework and its effectiveness was demonstrated. The analysis on the results of the case study discovered an insight that the opinions from the influenced elements are more convincing and respected in the consensus round than those from the influencing elements. C⃝ 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Syst Eng 18: 323-338, 2015

Improving supply chain management process using design structure matrix based cross‐functional analysis

“…If the interactions between 2 different elements can be assessed concurrently, for example via e‐mail, then the complexity of this step is approximately ( N ‐1). Therefore, the overall complexity of the procedure is between ( N ‐1) and ( N 2 ‐ N ) . Note that the scalability/complexity issue may limit the applicability of the proposed procedure to other SCM systems (with larger number of elements, in particular).…”

“…This interface was critical to make induction determination in a timely manner not to influence SM's ability to process the PR to Therefore, the overall complexity of the procedure is between (N-1) and (N 2 -N). 44 Note that the scalability/complexity issue may limit the applicability of the proposed procedure to other SCM systems (with larger number of elements, in particular).…”

“…Figures presents the IV DSMs for “from Plan to Source” (Chevron 2 → Chevron 3), “from Source to Order” (Chevron 3 → Chevron 4), and “Order to Execute” (Chevron 4 → Chevron 5). The DSMs were created using the biperspective group decision procedure, which was originally proposed by Moon et al and improved by Son et al [Step 5] Identify High‐Impact Areas and Critical Interfaces …”

Multi-attribute optimization-based system decomposition considering several value chain stakeholder perspectives

“…Product platform design methodologies focus on decomposing systems into common modules used for all products in the product family as well as variant modules to be used for individual products. This, in turn, enhances system commonality (Meyer and Lehnerd 1997). Additionally, decomposition and embedment of real options in modules to respond to future uncertainties are performed to enhance system flexibility (Suh et al 2007;Trigeorgis 1996).…”

A novel consensus model for multi-attribute large-scale group decision making based on comprehensive behavior classification and adaptive weight updating

“…Given the wide variety DMs' different backgrounds and expertise, DMs will have different evaluations on attributes or ordering of alternatives and conflict can easily arises [4]. Recent research has paid great attention to the consensus degree reached after decision results are collected from DMs, especially regarding decision making for public issues such as environmental problems [5] [6], policy making [7] [8], and infrastructure planning [9] [10].…”