The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2022
DOI: 10.32604/cmes.2022.018739
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Group Decision-Making Model of Renal Cancer Surgery Options Using Entropy Fuzzy Element Aczel-Alsina Weighted Aggregation Operators under the Environment of Fuzzy Multi-Sets

Abstract: Since existing selection methods of surgical treatment schemes of renal cancer patients mainly depend on physicians' clinical experience and judgments, the surgical treatment options of renal cancer patients lack their scientifical and reasonable information expression and group decision-making model for renal cancer patients. Fuzzy multi-sets (FMSs) have a number of properties, which make them suitable for expressing the uncertain information of medical diagnoses and treatments in group decision-making (GDM) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the information disclosure on the public health emergency evaluation index system is divided into four dimensions, and there is a correlation between the attributes of each dimension. The objective weighting method, the entropy value method [50], cannot directly obtain attribute weights based on the volatility or correlation of the assessment value, and is not suitable for a public health emergency information assessment. Although the variation coefficient method [51] considers the fluctuation of numerical values, and the principal component analysis method [52] considers the correlation between values, they are still not comprehensive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the information disclosure on the public health emergency evaluation index system is divided into four dimensions, and there is a correlation between the attributes of each dimension. The objective weighting method, the entropy value method [50], cannot directly obtain attribute weights based on the volatility or correlation of the assessment value, and is not suitable for a public health emergency information assessment. Although the variation coefficient method [51] considers the fluctuation of numerical values, and the principal component analysis method [52] considers the correlation between values, they are still not comprehensive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In FSs, Zadeh assigns membership grades to a set of components in the interval [0,1]. Zadeh's work on this topic is notable since many of the set theoretic elements of crisp circumstances were described for fuzzy sets and it plays an important role in decision making [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, with the promotion of science and technology and social needs, many decision-making problems in reality require the participation of a large number of decision-making experts, such as commercial projects, electronic democracy, emergency decision-making, etc [45][46][47][48]. In this situation, GDM that allows large-scale decision-makers to participate in the decision-making process has received increasing attention and has been widely applied [49][50][51][52][53]. Compared with decision-making, group decision-making can fully utilize various resources, fully leverage the advantages of different knowledge structures, and improve the comprehensiveness and objectivity of the decision-making process and results [54][55][56][57][58][59].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%