2007
DOI: 10.1002/j.1556-6978.2007.tb00032.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Group Coleadership: A Critical Review

Abstract: A review of group literature, much of which is anecdotal or theoretical, revealed that coleadership has been a common practice in training and therapeutic settings for well over 50 years. Careful examination of group practice reveals a surprisingly small amount of empirical evidence to support what apparently is a widely practiced method for the training of group leaders. However, the anecdotal support of group coleader practice is impressive if not convincing. That scholarly work is summarized in this article… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
1
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…18 The results of this study corroborated the highlighted advantages and some of the challenges from the literature on coleaders. Co-chiefs reported incidents of conflict and poor communication; they did not report any incidents of competition, envy, or overdependence.…”
supporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…18 The results of this study corroborated the highlighted advantages and some of the challenges from the literature on coleaders. Co-chiefs reported incidents of conflict and poor communication; they did not report any incidents of competition, envy, or overdependence.…”
supporting
confidence: 78%
“…One study highlighted the advantages to coleadership as ongoing processes of learning from, supporting, and challenging one another as well as not working in isolation. 18 Disadvantages of coleadership include the potential for interpersonal conflict, ineffective …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ancak ortak liderlik yönteminin grup dinamiğini pozitif yönde etkilediği gibi bir takım etik sorunları da beraberinde getirmektedir. Özellikle liderlerin farklı geçmiş deneyimleri, güçleri ve statüleri olması liderler arası bir yarışa neden olabilmekte, bu da grup dinamiğini olumsuz etkileyebilmektedir (26,29). Bu çalışmada grup liderlerinden birinin uzman adli psikolog olması ve diğer liderlerin ise psikoloji dördüncü sınıf öğrencileri olması nedeniyle farklı statü ve mesleki deneyim sorunlarının ortaya çıktığı, bunun da grup dinamiğini olumsuz yönde etkilemiş olabileceği düşünülmektedir.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…A solo trainee backed up by after‐the‐fact meetings with a supervisor might be better able to handle individual therapy cases. Along these lines, it seems noteworthy that cotherapy is widely accepted as a training and supervision method in the group therapy literature, though for the most part, this acceptance is based on theoretical considerations and anecdotal observation rather than outcome research data (Luke & Hackney, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%