2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0305-0483(03)00018-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Group cognitive mapping: a methodology and system for capturing and evaluating managerial and organizational cognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
82
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
82
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In practice, these maps are tools for structuring complex problems; and as such, they contribute to reduce the rate of omitted criteria, promote discussion, and lead to increased learning among the actors involved in the decision making framework, as a result of the exchange of ideas and experiences (cf. Tegarden, Sheetz 2003;Eden, Ackermann 2004;Jalali et al 2016). Carlucci et al (2013) and Ferreira et al (2016), among others, note that cognitive maps have two main functions: (1) a descriptive function, i.e.…”
Section: Risk Assessment Of Real Estate Investments and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, these maps are tools for structuring complex problems; and as such, they contribute to reduce the rate of omitted criteria, promote discussion, and lead to increased learning among the actors involved in the decision making framework, as a result of the exchange of ideas and experiences (cf. Tegarden, Sheetz 2003;Eden, Ackermann 2004;Jalali et al 2016). Carlucci et al (2013) and Ferreira et al (2016), among others, note that cognitive maps have two main functions: (1) a descriptive function, i.e.…”
Section: Risk Assessment Of Real Estate Investments and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such it provided the researchers with the means to explore the dynamics of cognition: how participants contribute to, and make sense of, their views and the views of others; and explore many aspects of how agreements were reached. It should be noted that this research focused on individual cognition as a basis for group negotiation, in contrast to that proposed by Sheetz et al (1994) and Tegarden and Sheetz (2003) who focus on capturing group and organizational thinking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Klimoski and Mohammed (1994) refer to 'team mental models', and undoubtedly the models (maps) developed in the plenary session could be regarded as a team mental model or a representation of group thinking (Sheetz et al 1994;Tegarden and Sheetz 2003). The creation of the team mental model, in the instance of the plenary session, was seen as likely to have been influenced substantially by (i) the declaration of different perspectives at the beginning of the meeting with some tentative linking to show different meanings of common statements, and (ii) the enforced structure provided by the requirement to work in trios representing each operating company.…”
Section: Collective Cognition-how Would We Know It?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Belton, Hodgkin 1999;Tegarden, Sheetz 2003;Eden, Ackermann 2004). according to ferreira et al (2012), the SODA method is characterized by: (1) the ability to deal with qualitative factors; (2) the ability to structure difficult situations; (3) the provision of support for group work; and (4) being of great use in the development and implementation of strategic directions.…”
Section: Cognitive Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Belton, Hodgkin 1999;Tegarden, Sheetz 2003;Eden, Ackermann 2004). At the same time, the AHP, understood as a technique for multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) based on mathematical algorithms and cognitive psychology (cf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%