2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Group cognition, membership change, and performance: Investigating the benefits and detriments of collective knowledge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
229
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 259 publications
(238 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
6
229
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…12 Research indicates that interactions among healthcare providers can have important influences on outcomes. [13][14][15][16][17] Additionally, the initial implementation of checklists to prevent central-line associated infections appeared to change provider relationships in a way that significantly influenced their success. 18 For example, positive primary care clinic member relationships as assessed by the Lanham framework have been associated with better chronic care model implementation, learning, and patient experience of care.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 Research indicates that interactions among healthcare providers can have important influences on outcomes. [13][14][15][16][17] Additionally, the initial implementation of checklists to prevent central-line associated infections appeared to change provider relationships in a way that significantly influenced their success. 18 For example, positive primary care clinic member relationships as assessed by the Lanham framework have been associated with better chronic care model implementation, learning, and patient experience of care.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The associated drop in team social identity and context has a negative impact on team know-how to perform certain tasks and to efficiently exchange information [6]. The loss of human and social capital results in a loss of coordination and control knowledge, such that members on teams with these personnel changes have to re-learn the various sources and recipients of team information [16]. Team knowledge about the most efficient ways to address problems changes, due to membership changes, as expert sources must be re-determined.…”
Section: Virtual Team Consistencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is the PCP's responsibility to inform the patient when he or she will be getting a new primary care physician 100 (27) 96 (23) It is the non-physician PACT members' responsibility to inform the patient that their PCP will be leaving and the patient will be getting another PCP 52 (14) 38 (9) I can help make transitions for residents' patients easier 81 (22) 67 (16) There should be a formal approach to making patients aware that their PCP is leaving and they will be getting another PCP 81 (22) 79 ( "Have the leaving PCP discuss the issue with the patient on the last appointment." "3rd year residents in their last 6 months should remind patients in a nice way that they will be getting a new PCP sometime soon."…”
Section: Resident Pactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For care to become more shared among PACT members, responsibility, trust, mindfulness, and heedfulness must be present. In addition, research on teams has shown there is a decrement in function when team members change, even if only a single member leaves, 22 underscoring the harm that can potentially occur in resident clinics with EOR transitions and disrupted relationships.…”
Section: Resident Pactmentioning
confidence: 99%