1999
DOI: 10.1007/s001220051210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Group coancestry-controlled selection in a Pinus sylvestris L. breeding program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many studies on tree breeding theory considered the effects of selection on gain estimates and genetic diversity in the form of an effective population size for breeding and production populations (Wei andLindgren 1995, 1996;Lindgren and Mullin 1997;Andersson et al 1999;Kang 2001;Olsson et al 2001, Lindgren andPrescher 2005). Although these studies stress the trade-offs between diversity and genetic gain that follow selection decisions, they do not consider explicitly the biological cost of inbreeding in terms of the merchantable volume production at rotation age.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies on tree breeding theory considered the effects of selection on gain estimates and genetic diversity in the form of an effective population size for breeding and production populations (Wei andLindgren 1995, 1996;Lindgren and Mullin 1997;Andersson et al 1999;Kang 2001;Olsson et al 2001, Lindgren andPrescher 2005). Although these studies stress the trade-offs between diversity and genetic gain that follow selection decisions, they do not consider explicitly the biological cost of inbreeding in terms of the merchantable volume production at rotation age.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expected gains may be estimated by BLUP breeding value (BV), but usually the selection of candidate trees involves some constraints on relatedness among individual genotypes. One criterion to cope with the balance between gain and inbreeding is based on optimal effective population size for breeding and production populations (Weir and Lindgren 1996;Lindgren and Mullin 1997;Anderson et al 1999;Olsson et al 2001). Brisbane and Gibson (1995) proposed a method that maximizes the genetic gain for a given level of inbreeding based on group merit selection (GMS), which incorporates breeding value and coancestry into a single selection criterion that penalizes the increase of average coancestry in the selected group GMS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We call a spacetime satisfying these assumptions a CMC cosmological vacuum spacetime. For surveys of prior work on such spacetimes, see [10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%