2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(03)15389-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Group B streptococcal disease in UK and Irish infants younger than 90 days

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
230
1
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 231 publications
(262 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
18
230
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, neonatal listeriosis remains to be a rare disease. However, the casefatality rate of neonatal listeriosis remains high; in our case series this was 21% (24% if probable cases were included) whereas the more common Group B streptococcal infection has a lower fatality rate (9.7%) [17]. Therefore, despite its rarity, improvements in the recognition and prevention of listeriosis need to be identified.…”
Section: A C C E P T E D Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, neonatal listeriosis remains to be a rare disease. However, the casefatality rate of neonatal listeriosis remains high; in our case series this was 21% (24% if probable cases were included) whereas the more common Group B streptococcal infection has a lower fatality rate (9.7%) [17]. Therefore, despite its rarity, improvements in the recognition and prevention of listeriosis need to be identified.…”
Section: A C C E P T E D Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…of neonatal infection, such as Group B streptococcal infection, with an incidence of 72 per 100,000 live births [17]. Therefore, neonatal listeriosis remains to be a rare disease.…”
Section: A C C E P T E D Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This intervention has high effi cacy in preventing early-onset group B streptococcus and has substantially reduced the incidence of early-onset disease since its introduction in the 1990s. 8,9,37 Risk of group B streptococcal disease was two-times less in studies with small proportions (<20%) of infected low-birthweight infants than in studies with proportions ranging from 20-39%. Infants with low birthweight have a high risk of group B streptococcal infection and underrepresentation in a study sample can lead to substantial underestimations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We also gathered data on potential explanatory variables (ie, variables that might explain variance in incidence or risk of group B streptococcus; 21 Andersen et al 22 Ekelund et al 23 Kuhn et al 24 Fluegge et al 25 Berardi et al 26 Trijbels-Smeulders et al 27 van den Hoogen et al 28 Hasseltvedt et al 29 Hajdu et al 30 Neto et al 31 Janek et al 32 Carbonell-Estrany et al 33 Lopez Sastre et al 34 Andreu et al 35 Persson et al 36 Heath et al 37 Oddie et al 38 Weisner et al 39 Vergnano et al 40 Subtotal (I 2 =98·6%, p=0·000)…”
Section: Data Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation