Group and Students Profiles to Support Collaborative Learning in a Multiagent Model

Costaguta, Rosanna; Durán, Elena Beatriz

doi:10.1007/978-3-642-34010-9_13

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Para realizar alguna actividad grupal de manera efectiva, se debe proporcionar, según Costaguta [2] los medios necesarios para incentivar a los participantes a trabajar de forma colaborativa. Con el fin de resolver las dificultades como la mala comunicación, abandono, falta de participación y evaluación que se generan en una actividad grupal; se crea la herramienta Marco Lógico Colaborativo (MLC), la cual busca facilitar la colaboración mediante el uso de preguntas, expresión de opiniones y evaluación del conocimiento adquirido, estudiando las características colaborativas que tiene cada persona en un grupo de trabajo.…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Collaborative logical framework: An e-learning assesment tool in .LRN platform

Alvarado

Alfaro

Chacón-Rivas

et al. 2016

2016 XI Latin American Conference on Learning Objects and Technology (LACLO)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the teaching and learning process, one of the most widely used assessments under the constructivist model is to work in groups. This has many advantages, but also weaknesses such as lack of collaboration, poor organization, difficulty in assessing, poor communication, among others. This paper describes the functionality of the Collaborative Logical Framework and the redesign made by the TEC Digital Tecnológico de Costa Rica (TEC) which aims to aid students and teachers to reduce the problems that can be generated working in groups, through a tool integrated in a LMS applying usability criteria on web and mobile platforms and some integrations with others applications on .LRN LMS. This was validated applying a survey to grade and postgrade students at the TEC. The results were favorable, such as the usability of the interface, in a (very low) scale of 1 to 5 (very high) average usability by the twenty seven students surveyed is 4 points.

show abstract

Section: Introductionunclassified