2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.11.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Group analysis of regulation of fibroblast genome on low-adhesion nanostructures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In support of this, several groups have observed a decrease in β1 expression after exposure to topographic cues or other surface modifications [32, 36]. Studies from Dalby et al using anisotropic patterns of nanoscale hexagonal pits reported a similar decrease in ECM expression from fibroblasts [37]. It is possible that surfaces with topographical cues act as a negative feedback loop to decrease the production of proteins that would otherwise act as adherence support.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In support of this, several groups have observed a decrease in β1 expression after exposure to topographic cues or other surface modifications [32, 36]. Studies from Dalby et al using anisotropic patterns of nanoscale hexagonal pits reported a similar decrease in ECM expression from fibroblasts [37]. It is possible that surfaces with topographical cues act as a negative feedback loop to decrease the production of proteins that would otherwise act as adherence support.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Similarly, modifying fibroblast adhesion and changing cell shape alters cytoskeletal organization and shrinks the nucleus and nuclear lamina of cultured cells. These changes in the cytoskeleton and nuclear morphology are associated with impaired polymerase access to chromosomal territories and a concomitant reduction in gene transcription91,101103. More convincingly, Rho-family GTPases indirectly regulate histone H4 acetylation by shifting the balance of cellular and nuclear pools of F and G actin, which in turn, modifies the association between serum response factor (SRF) and its co-activator MAL (also known as MKL1)104106.…”
Section: Gene Expression and Forcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past it has been shown that when mammalian cells bind to surfaces, the detailed surface topography influences the cell behaviour with respect to processes such as adhesion, orientation, differentiation, proliferation, changes in contact guidance, cytoskeletal organisation, focal adhesion point organization, apoptosis, macrophage activation, and gene expression [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. Several papers have indicated that phosphorylation, expression, and translocation of transcription factors are factors that play a major role in the cellular response when cells are growing on micro-and nanostructured surfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%