2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Groundwater recharge and evapotranspiration for two natural ecosystems covered with oak and heather

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
30
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(43 reference statements)
3
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…as well as from low heath vegetation (95 mm/yr.) found under similar climatic conditions, while the high evaporation rate found at Stall 4 is around half the evapotranspiration from land covered with high oak (515 mm/yr) [28]. This indicates that evaporation rates of PICP, PC and RB with sub-base of coarse aggregates (C u = 6.7-9.1) are comparable to evaporation rates from soil, however, covered with a natural vegetation, while PA on same type of sub-base aggregates are even higher.…”
Section: Total Volume Reduction (Vr Total )mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…as well as from low heath vegetation (95 mm/yr.) found under similar climatic conditions, while the high evaporation rate found at Stall 4 is around half the evapotranspiration from land covered with high oak (515 mm/yr) [28]. This indicates that evaporation rates of PICP, PC and RB with sub-base of coarse aggregates (C u = 6.7-9.1) are comparable to evaporation rates from soil, however, covered with a natural vegetation, while PA on same type of sub-base aggregates are even higher.…”
Section: Total Volume Reduction (Vr Total )mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Recently-developed non-destructive techniques for automatic high-frequency, volumetric measurement of soil water content, such as time-domain-reflectometry (TDR), make it possible to estimate PR more accurately, and to estimate and validate soil water balance model components (Ladekarl, 1999;Ladekarl et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The changes were largely due to the altered interception loss and the increased water extraction from the root zone. However, results of paired watershed research agreed only on the direction of the changes, not on their magnitude (Andressian 2004).Comparative water balance studies of forest and low vegetation covers have generally shown higher water use of forest cover (Ladekarl et al 2005, Nachabe et al 2005, Schilling 2007. Nachabe et al (2005) analyzed the groundwater consumption in a shallow water table environment and estimated the annual ET for a forested area (1320 mm) and for a pasture (700 mm) using detailed soil moisture and water table monitoring.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%