2019
DOI: 10.1145/3359209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GroundTruth: Augmenting Expert Image Geolocation with Crowdsourcing and Shared Representations

Abstract: Expert investigators bring advanced skills and deep experience to analyze visual evidence, but they face limits on their time and attention. In contrast, crowds of novices can be highly scalable and parallelizable, but lack expertise. In this paper, we introduce the concept of shared representations for crowd--augmented expert work, focusing on the complex sensemaking task of image geolocation performed by professional journalists and human rights investigators. We built GroundTruth, an online system that uses… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We offer our findings as a valuable foundation for demonstrating what types of visual questions need to be included/added in future datasets for the machine learning community. Our work also reinforces the importance of participatory design [33] in creating such crowdsourcing tasks and motivates the importance of changing the status quo, such as by engaging real users with crowd workers to guide them to generate practically relevant data (e.g., extending the work of Venkatagiri et al [55]).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…We offer our findings as a valuable foundation for demonstrating what types of visual questions need to be included/added in future datasets for the machine learning community. Our work also reinforces the importance of participatory design [33] in creating such crowdsourcing tasks and motivates the importance of changing the status quo, such as by engaging real users with crowd workers to guide them to generate practically relevant data (e.g., extending the work of Venkatagiri et al [55]).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…• • Professions outside of computing, such as teaching (Gautam et al, 2017), journalism (Venkatagiri et al, 2019), and medicine (Mentis et al, 2012); • • Interpersonal issues, including the home (Wolf et al, 2019), relationships (Brereton et al, 2015;Moser et al, 2017), privacy (Ackerman and Mainwaring, 2005), and ludic engagement (Gaver et al, 2004); • • Community issues, such as community art (Jacobs et al, 2016), community policing (Israni et al, 2017), and urban design (Mahyar et al, 2016); • • Societal issues, such as development (Dell and Kumar, 2016), politics (Kuznetsov et al, 2011), andsustainability (DiSalvo et al, 2010).…”
Section: The Expanding Circles Of Ib and Hcimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Professions outside of computing, such as teaching (Gautam et al, 2017), journalism (Venkatagiri et al, 2019), and medicine (Mentis et al, 2012);…”
Section: Paradigms As Circles Of Concernmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A possible direction is to evolve the VCE to support crowd-augmented expert work, a model where experts are simultaneously performing the same (or a superset) of tasks as the crowd, and their own work is shaped and redirected based on the crowd results. This model has been recently applied with success to the task of geolocating images using the concept of shared representations [Venkatagiri et al 2019]. One could also envision a shared representation between a remote crowdworker and a local volunteer engaged through a spatial crowdsourcing application.…”
Section: Complementarity To Other Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%