Grounded Theory

Hensel, Przemysław; Glinka, Beata

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-65217-7_3

Cited by 10 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…According to Hensel and Glinka (2018), the grounded theory is a systematic approach in which qualitative data are collected through interviewing, reviewing documents and observation. When conducting interviews, the researcher usually uses open interviews that are not structured.…”

Section: Research Methodology: Grounded Theorymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Hence, there is no mathematical calculus on the number of cases, and more optional decisions are made in multiple case studies. At the beginning of any grounded theory research, the number of samples is not known and their selection and examination will be decided according to the research objectives during the research until the information saturation be reached (Yin, 2017; Hensel and Glinka, 2018).…”

Section: Research Methodology: Grounded Theorymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Sampling continues until it reaches the saturation point. This means that no new and important data is collected during the data collection, and the categories are rich in terms of dimensions and features (Hensel and Glinka, 2018). For this research, semi-structured interviews were conducted with a total of 10 managers of petrochemicals and faculty members of the universities of Bushehr province.…”

Section: Research Methodology: Grounded Theorymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

A paradigmatic model for shared value innovation management in the supply chain

Faghat

Khani

Alem-Tabriz

2020

IJIS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to propose a paradigmatic model for shared value innovation management in the supply chain. This research seeks to identify the causal conditions, strategies, contextual factors, intervening factors and the consequences of shared value innovation in the supply chain. Design/methodology/approach The approach of this research is qualitative and has been carried out in the framework of the grounded theory. Required data for the research was collected through semi-structured interviews. Coding was done in two steps and the reliability of the results of the research was confirmed by calculating the similarity index of codes by two methods. Findings The proposed framework is presented in the form of a paradigmatic model and demonstrates how to achieve shared value innovation through increasing adoption with customer considerations, improving communication between supply chain members, improving collaboration among supply chain members, enhancing trust among supply chain members, enhancing the commitment of the supply chain members, enhancing supply chain members’ interdependence while maintaining their independence and simultaneously reducing costs. The results of the analysis showed that the shared value innovation leads to positive consequences such as increasing competitive abilities, human development, synergy, inclusive growth and development and also the sustainability of the business situation. Originality/value Although some studies have shown the importance of value innovation in different parts of the organization and to some extent the introduction of shared value innovation, no research has been done to provide a framework or model for managing shared value innovation.

show abstract

Section: Research Methodology: Grounded Theorymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Research Methodology: Grounded Theorymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Research Methodology: Grounded Theorymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A paradigmatic model for shared value innovation management in the supply chain

Faghat

Khani

Alem-Tabriz

2020

IJIS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The data was gathered from different sources and after that, analyzed by the codes creation, according to the grounded theory assumptions. Codes were formed within the approach "incident-to-incident" (Hensel & Glinka, 2018). Then, data were compared to verify, if some points are indicated by more than one side and which attributes they hold.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Commemoration or commodification? A stakeholder’s discourse around the establishment of the martyrdom museum

Sawczuk

2020

IER

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of the article was to explore a mode of stakeholders' discussion arrangement with the support of social media platforms, about the project of a new dark-heritage oriented museum. Research Design & Methods: The study was realized within the qualitative approach and case study method. The project of the new museum in Krakow was selected purposively for analysis. Findings: The results revealed differences in stakeholders' demands, barriers in participative projects as well as how conflicting values are managed. Moreover, the usage of social media may sway the stakeholder's attributes, as well as enhance participation of the other. Contribution & Value Added: The study contributes by analyzing a multi-stakeholder dialogue focused on the wider museum environment. The practice of participation is hard for effective realization, even if stakeholder expectations are similar.

show abstract

“…All 130 interviews were transcribed. The analysis of the data was based on grounded theory procedures (Hensel and Glinka, 2018), such as coding and defining categories as they emerged from the empirical material. Open and in vivo coding (Charmaz, 2006) conducted in the Atlas.ti package was used to identify emergent codes and, later, to create categories and family of codes.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Imitation in immigrant entrepreneurship: an analytical framework

Glinka

Hensel

2020

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThe phenomenon of imitation has attracted immense attention in studies of big companies, but it has been largely neglected in the immigrant entrepreneurship research thus far. The purpose of this paper is to address that gap by proposing a theoretical framework for studying immigrant entrepreneurship imitation decisions.Design/methodology/approachThe framework is based on a review of relevant literature covering the issue of imitation within three perspectives: institutional, heuristics of judgement and organisational learning. We validate the framework by juxtaposing it with existing studies on immigrant entrepreneurship, where imitation practices were directly and indirectly referred to. The framework is also initially validated with data from three qualitative studies performed by the authors.FindingsThe literature-derived framework consists of three major building blocks (i.e. causes, target and content of imitation) while immigrant-entrepreneurship specificity (ethnic groups and clusters, ethnic identity, generation, and resources) constitutes the context of the framework. The authors formulate 12 propositions on which the framework is based. The specific character of immigrant entrepreneurs' imitation decision is discussed, and differences in that regard between immigrant entrepreneurs and established local businesses are highlighted.Research limitations/implicationsA more diversified sample and quantitative studies are needed to further verify the proposed framework and propositions.Social implicationsThe framework is intended to expedite future research on immigrant entrepreneurs' imitative decisions and facilitate better-adjusted public policy to support immigrant entrepreneurs.Originality/valueThis paper drives attention to a widely used, yet understudied phenomenon of imitation, provides an analytical framework for the study of imitation in immigrant entrepreneurship, provides a preliminary validation of the framework and contributes to a better understanding of immigrant behaviour.

show abstract

Grounded Theory

Cited by 10 publications

References 14 publications

A paradigmatic model for shared value innovation management in the supply chain

A paradigmatic model for shared value innovation management in the supply chain

Commemoration or commodification? A stakeholder’s discourse around the establishment of the martyrdom museum

Imitation in immigrant entrepreneurship: an analytical framework

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About