1995
DOI: 10.3133/ofr9276
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ground-water resources of Kings and Queens Counties, Long Island, New York

Abstract: Flow million gallons per day (Mgal/d} million gallons per day per square mile 25.4 0.3048 0.1894 0.04381 0.01692 [(Mgal/d)/mi2J Water Density grams per cubic centimeter {g/cm 3) Chemical Concentration milligmms per liter (mg/L) To Obtain millimeter meter kilometer square kilometer hectare liter cubic meter cubic meter millimeter per year meter per day meter per kilometer cubic meter per second cubic meter per second per square kilometer Sea level: In this report "sea level" refers to the National Geodetic Vert… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The more significant discrepancy between the model and field observations occurs along the southern shore of western Long Island, where Perlmutter et al (1959) reported the presence of sea water within the upper Pleistocene outwash sands, brackish water within the upper Cretaceous Magothy aquifer, and fresh water within the basal Cretaceous sands (Lloyd aquifer) along southwestern Long Island. The area where salt water is observed in the Magothy‐Jameco aquifer has complex hydrogeology with local erosion features that may play a role in the presence of salt water (Buxton and Shernoff 1999). It appears that our model overpredicts the extent of fresh water beneath southwestern Long Island extending under the ocean, although predevelopment salinity data are not available.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The more significant discrepancy between the model and field observations occurs along the southern shore of western Long Island, where Perlmutter et al (1959) reported the presence of sea water within the upper Pleistocene outwash sands, brackish water within the upper Cretaceous Magothy aquifer, and fresh water within the basal Cretaceous sands (Lloyd aquifer) along southwestern Long Island. The area where salt water is observed in the Magothy‐Jameco aquifer has complex hydrogeology with local erosion features that may play a role in the presence of salt water (Buxton and Shernoff 1999). It appears that our model overpredicts the extent of fresh water beneath southwestern Long Island extending under the ocean, although predevelopment salinity data are not available.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted, however, that the Lloyd aquifer terminates (and crops out) along Long Island Sound proximal (2 to 3 km) to these well fields. The more problematic area is along the southern shore of western Long Island, where saline water has been observed in the Magothy‐Jameco aquifer since measurements have been made (Buxton and Shernoff 1999). Possible erosional breaks in the confining unit overlying the Magothy aquifer (not represented in our regional scale model) could be the cause of this observed salt water intrusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2B). This new drainage included the lower reaches of the Raritan and its tributaries the Millstone and Passaic, which drained to the north of Staten Island and then east via a buried valley across Brooklyn (Buxton & Shernoff 1999) into the Hudson. The Hudson, in turn, exited to the shelf through a south‐trending valley in Queens that is now buried by glacial deposits.…”
Section: Diversion Of Pensauken Rivermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Gardiners Clay unconformably overlies the Jameco Gravel or crystalline bedrock, both of which are found in the watershed. Regionally, crystalline bedrock is encountered beneath the glacial outwash to the west of the canal (Buxton & Shernoff, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, investigations beneath and adjacent to the canal found NAPL at depths greater than 80 ft in the native material beneath and adjacent to the canal (GEI, ). Overpumping ended to stop saltwater intrusion in the early 1950s, and the cone of depression slowly recovered to where hydraulic gradients are now toward the canal (Buxton & Shernoff, ). Groundwater modeling of current conditions estimates that the integrated rate of groundwater discharge to the canal is approximately 50 L/sec (GEI, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%