2020
DOI: 10.1002/joc.6640
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ground validation ofTRMM 3B43 V7precipitation estimates over Colombia. Part I: Monthly and seasonal timescales

Abstract: In this study, we validate precipitation estimates remotely sensed by the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) at monthly and seasonal timescales, during the period 1998-2015, by calculating and analyzing diverse error metrics between the 3B43 V7 product and in situ measurements from 1,180 rain gauges over Colombia, of which at least 987 are fully independent of TRMM. We explore the existence of spatiotemporal patterns to assess the performance of 3B43 V7 over the five major natural regions of Colombia: … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
2
15
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This study evaluates the efficacy of the CHIRPS v2.0 database through statistical comparisons with rain gauge information provided by IDEAM. Similar to previous research [11,[14][15][16][17][18][19][20], our results indicate that CHIRPS v2.0 preserves important rainfall characteristics such as mean and seasonality at monthly and annual timescales. The bias and error metrics agree with the results of authors such as Katsanos et al [62], Urrea et al [11], Paredes Trejo et al [63], Dinku et al [20], and Alemu and Bawoke [48], among others.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study evaluates the efficacy of the CHIRPS v2.0 database through statistical comparisons with rain gauge information provided by IDEAM. Similar to previous research [11,[14][15][16][17][18][19][20], our results indicate that CHIRPS v2.0 preserves important rainfall characteristics such as mean and seasonality at monthly and annual timescales. The bias and error metrics agree with the results of authors such as Katsanos et al [62], Urrea et al [11], Paredes Trejo et al [63], Dinku et al [20], and Alemu and Bawoke [48], among others.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…These conclusions are similar to those from Cruz-Roa et al [13], where they created rainfall maps through cokriging using ground data and elevation. Researchers have widely used satellite rainfall datasets for case studies in Colombia in recent years [14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. Baez-Villanueva et al [21] analyzed the temporal and spatial evaluation of satellite rainfall data over Chile, Brazil, and Colombia using six different estimates: TRMM 3B42v7, TRMM 3B42RT, CHIRPSv2, CMORPHv1, PERSIANN-CDR, and MSWEPv2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For temperature, both [31]. Moreover, satellite products like TRMM (considered here as the reference dataset for precipitation) exhibit biases in Colombia, with overestimations in the Andes and underestimations in the Pacific region [81]. Therefore, we also compare model simulations with respect to climatological annual cycles from IDEAM gauges located across the country.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Historical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We acknowledge that GPM products suffer from calibration and scale issues (0.1° × 0.1° grid size; Tang et al., 2020) and that there are sites like Lloró or other places on Earth showing long‐term rain gauge records exceeding this record‐breaking GPM‐based estimate. Regardless of the inherited uncertainties of the remote sensing precipitation products (Vallejo‐Bernal et al., 2020), the region offshore of the Colombian Pacific coast shows a striking, broad, coherent area of precipitation maximum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%