2017
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6544/aa7eac
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ground states and high energy solutions of the planar Schrödinger–Poisson system

Abstract: In this paper, we are concerned with the Schrödinger-Poisson systemDue to its relevance in physics, the system has been extensively studied and is quite well understood in the case d ≥ 3. In contrast, much less information is available in the planar case d = 2 which is the focus of the present paper. It has been observed by Cingolani and the second author [6] that the variational structure of (0.1) differs substantially in the case d = 2 and leads to a richer structure of the set of solutions. However, the var… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
66
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(45 reference statements)
1
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that normalΨfalse(sn,vnfalse),false(τ,wfalse)=Ifalse(hfalse(sn,vnfalse)false),hfalse(sn,wfalse)+scriptJfalse(hfalse(sn,vnfalse)false)τ,.3em.3emfalse(τ,wfalse)trueH˜. Let un:=hfalse(sn,vnfalse). As the proof in [, Lemma 3.2], we can deduce that false{unfalse} satisfies .…”
Section: Preliminaries and Variational Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Note that normalΨfalse(sn,vnfalse),false(τ,wfalse)=Ifalse(hfalse(sn,vnfalse)false),hfalse(sn,wfalse)+scriptJfalse(hfalse(sn,vnfalse)false)τ,.3em.3emfalse(τ,wfalse)trueH˜. Let un:=hfalse(sn,vnfalse). As the proof in [, Lemma 3.2], we can deduce that false{unfalse} satisfies .…”
Section: Preliminaries and Variational Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, (F6) and (F7) are weaker than the following assumptions which are easier to state and verify: (F8)there exist constants α2>0 and p3,p4false[2,3false) such that α2(|u|p3+|u|p4)f(u)u3F(u)0,uR. (F9)the function 52ffalse(ufalse)u3Ffalse(ufalse)false|ufalse|9false/5u is nondecreasing on both false(,0false) and false(0,false). We can verify easily that F(8) implies (F6) and F(9) implies (F7). In, Du and Weth proved the existence of ground states and high energy solutions for the logarithmic Choquard equations in the two‐dimensional case with the nonlinearity ffalse(ufalse)=false|ufalse|p2u, which satisfies (F8) when 2p<3. Cingolani and Weth also obtained the existence of nontrivial solutions for the logarithmic Choquard equations in double-struckR2 with the nonlinearity ffalse(ufalse)=bfalse|ufalse|p2u, which satisfies (AR) when p>4.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A key difficulty in order to construct solutions variationally is that the functional I is not well-defined on the natural Sobolev space H 1 (R N ). For the two-dimensional logarithmic Newton kernel, variational methods have been applied successfully in the framework of the Hilbert space of functions u : R N → R such that (1.2)ˆR 2 |∇u| 2 + 1 + V − |u| 2 < +∞ (see [6,8,10,11,26,27]). A delicate point in this approach is that although the Choquard equation (C) and the associated energy functional I are invariant under translations of the Euclidean space R N , the Hilbert space naturally defined by the quadratic form (1.2) is not any more invariant under translation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%