2001
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1090-0241(2001)127:11(939)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ground Response during Pile Driving

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Roy et al (1981) suggested that an influencing zone of pore pressure generation could be as far as r = 3d. This investigation shows that pore pressures were not zero even at a distance of 5d, so a large range of 15d (Hwang et al 2001;Ni et al 2017b) seems to be a more reasonable estimation. The maximum pore pressures were obtained at piezometer P3, as it was placed at a greater depth and a shorter distance.…”
Section: R a F Tmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Roy et al (1981) suggested that an influencing zone of pore pressure generation could be as far as r = 3d. This investigation shows that pore pressures were not zero even at a distance of 5d, so a large range of 15d (Hwang et al 2001;Ni et al 2017b) seems to be a more reasonable estimation. The maximum pore pressures were obtained at piezometer P3, as it was placed at a greater depth and a shorter distance.…”
Section: R a F Tmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…At the pile tip of 11.7d, a permeable pile can help to accelerate pore pressure dissipation at a distance of at least 5d. This is of particular importance since pore pressure decreases with distance exponentially (a logarithmic function of distance), although it could influence a range within 15d (Hwang et al 2001;Ni et al 2017b).…”
Section: R a F Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development law for excess pore water pressure is consistent with the research results of Tang et al [11], Zhu [20], and Dash et al [21] on excess pore water pressure in the soil around piles. Hwang et al [22] believed that no matter it is a silt layer (6 m) or a clay layer (9 m), the pore water pressure at the same horizontal depth during the jacking process changes almost simultaneously. However, the excess pore water pressure immediately before the pile-soil interface began to dissipate earlier than in previous works.…”
Section: Distribution Of Pore Water Pressurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, ground vibrations from the motion of the landslide itself could have caused cyclic shearing and contraction of the alluvial sediments, leading to increases in sediment pore-water pressure. Whereas earthquakes are a common cause of cyclic shearing, liquefaction has also been documented as a result of other weaker modes of vibration, including seismic exploration (Hryciw et al, 1990), blasting (Charlie et al, 1992;Ashford et al, 2006), train traffic (Pando et al, 2001), pile driving (Hwang et al, 2001), and even ocean waves (Dalrymple, 1979).…”
Section: Liquefaction From Cyclic Shearingmentioning
confidence: 99%