2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2012.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ground reaction forces in shallow water running are affected by immersion level, running speed and gender

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although an individual's body composition (i.e., greater percentage of fat mass) can augment the effects of buoyancy in water (44), the present study's participants had normal BMI (23.5 kg$m 22 ) and healthy percent body fat (26.3%). Furthermore, the addition of anterior ground reaction forces caused by frontal drag and turbulence decreases the frequency and velocity of running strides while moving forward in water (16,23). Given the standardized requirements of the SWR test protocol, including a water depth similar to or greater than that used in the present study (1.2 meters), a reduction in energy expenditure and HR would result.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although an individual's body composition (i.e., greater percentage of fat mass) can augment the effects of buoyancy in water (44), the present study's participants had normal BMI (23.5 kg$m 22 ) and healthy percent body fat (26.3%). Furthermore, the addition of anterior ground reaction forces caused by frontal drag and turbulence decreases the frequency and velocity of running strides while moving forward in water (16,23). Given the standardized requirements of the SWR test protocol, including a water depth similar to or greater than that used in the present study (1.2 meters), a reduction in energy expenditure and HR would result.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The underlying mechanisms that explain these differences involve hydrodynamic properties, viscosity, and hydrostatic pressure, as well as the water depth. These variables will, in turn, affect buoyancy, propulsion, drag forces, ground reaction forces (i.e., forces exerted by the floor on the body), and muscle recruitment patterns throughout AE movements (12,13,16,23). When the individual is immersed to a depth where water level reaches the xiphoid process, buoyancy properties reduce vertical ground reaction forces and offload body weight by approximately 60% or more (22,24).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the dry land environment, some studies developed in the aquatic environment have shown similar V-GRF values between diff erent self-selected velocities during walking in shallow water [ 33 , 41 ] . On the other hand, recent studies observed that the V-GRF was signifi cantly higher as the cadence or speed was increased during water aerobic exercises [ 4 , 12 ] or shallow-water walking [ 22 ] . Although recent experiments have simultaneously investigated the EMG and V-GRF responses during shallow-water walking [ 9 , 10 , 33 ] , comparisons between diff erent water aerobic exercises performed at different intensities have been scarcely investigated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Consequently, an increase in acceleration during the contact of the foot with the plate follows, resulting in a greater V-GRF. In addition, with the increased intensity, an increase in the V-GRF is observed due to the requirement of a greater propulsive to overcome the drag force [ 22 ] . However, in contrast to the shallow-water walking, for this kind of exercise there is an absence of horizontal propulsion, with vertical propulsion being necessary for these movements, especially for the SR and FK exercises.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) Estimating the stress in the refilled defect. The maximal stress was estimated from the treadmill speed to the knee joint force, and to the stress in the refilled defect: studies have shown the maximal knee joint force increased nonlinearly with the moving speed . In one study, the peak knee forces in human were 2 × body weight for slow walking, 2.5 × body weight for fast walking, and 4 × body weight for jogging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%