2014
DOI: 10.4103/0019-557x.128170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gross congenital malformation at birth in a government hospital

Abstract: A hospital-based cross-sectional study was undertaken to determine proportion of gross congenital malformation (GCMF) occurring at intramural births. Rate of GCMF was found to be 16.4/1000 consecutive singleton births (>28 weeks) with three leading malformation as anencephaly (44.68%), talipes equinovarus (17.02%) and meningomyelocele (10.63%). Higher risk of malformed births were noticed amongst un-booked (2.07%) in-comparison to booked (1.01%) mothers; women with low level of education (up to 8 years [2.14%]… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
31
4
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
7
31
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It was concluded in various previous studies that incidence of congenital anomalies is higher among abortions and preterm births Bhat et al, Sachdeva et al, which are consistent with the result of our study. [7][8][9] The number of still births was 85%, similar reports are reported in studies by Sachdeva et al and Chaturvedi.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…It was concluded in various previous studies that incidence of congenital anomalies is higher among abortions and preterm births Bhat et al, Sachdeva et al, which are consistent with the result of our study. [7][8][9] The number of still births was 85%, similar reports are reported in studies by Sachdeva et al and Chaturvedi.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…In our study, males (2%) were found to be more commonly affected as compared to females (1.43%) which is similar to the observations of Sarkar et al and Taksande et al while Sachdeva et al found higher incidence of malformations in females as compared to males. 8,9,12 Swain and Marwah et al found no significant difference among males and females. 10,11 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…7 The incidence of congenital malformations in our study was found to be 1.7 per 1000 live births which is consistent with studies conducted in various parts of our country. 1,[8][9][10][11][12][13][14] The reported incidence in various studies is around 2% except the study conducted by Marwah et al who have reported a higher incidence of malformations (4.44%) in Punjab. 15 This could be due to increasing number of referrals coming to the hospital, inclusion of minor anomalies, racial, geographic and ethnic factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations