2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.123989
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Greywater treatment using an oxygen-based membrane biofilm reactor: Formation of dynamic multifunctional biofilm for organics and nitrogen removal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Suspended solids concentrations (TSS and VSS) were measured according to the standard method [29]. The LAS concentrations were determined by the methylene blue spectrophotometric method [30,31]. To evaluate the statistical difference between results from different experimental conditions, we used the student's t-test was to test the null (no difference) hypothesis of quality at a 95% confidence level.…”
Section: Analytical Methods and Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suspended solids concentrations (TSS and VSS) were measured according to the standard method [29]. The LAS concentrations were determined by the methylene blue spectrophotometric method [30,31]. To evaluate the statistical difference between results from different experimental conditions, we used the student's t-test was to test the null (no difference) hypothesis of quality at a 95% confidence level.…”
Section: Analytical Methods and Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, biofilms at the top and stratification of the reactor contained more colorful microbial species including aerobic, anoxic and anaerobic microorganisms due to the relatively high DO concentrations; but the anaerobic bacteria containing Desulfovibrionales, Rhodospirillales and Oceanospirillales 25,26 were predominant in the biofilms at the bottom of the reactor in Phases II and III. Results further indicated that DO concentration would significantly affects the succession of microbial community structure in the BhGAC-DBfR; high DO favors the formation of multifarious genes in the aerobic-anoxic-anaerobic biofilm at the top of the reactor 12,27 , low DO favors the formation of anaerobic biofilm 21 and led to the relatively less abundant microbial communities at the bottom of the reactor.…”
Section: Microbial Community Successionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…that favored the formation of denitrification related bacteria 12,29 . The potential enzymes functional for ON (minor extracellular protease, D-amino-acid oxidase, glutamate dehydrogenase (NAD(p)+), L-serine dehydratase, deoxyribonuclease Ⅰ, and urease) 30,31 and ammonia metabolism (glutamate dehydrogenases, ammonia monooxygenase (AMO), nitrite oxidoreductase (NXR) and hydroxylamine oxidase) 28,32 mirrored the dynamics of those for LAS metabolisms.…”
Section: Microbial Community Successionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Increased methane production potential and COD (chemical oxygen demand) removal efficiency using anaerobic membrane bioreactors (AnMBR) for sewer mining may be studied to optimize the environmental performance of sustainable community-based systems [50], however, upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) technology may have a better environmental performance, due to the associated environmental impacts of AnMBR membrane fouling [51]. Various other technologies based on circular economy thinking may be modelled to further improve the environmental performance of sanitation options, such as nutrient recovery [52,53], biogas production from urban organic waste [54,55] and blackwater [17,[56][57][58], and water reuse from source-diverted greywater [59].…”
Section: Other Resource Recovery and Future Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%