2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-11906-9_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Greenhouse Gas from Organic Waste Composting: Emissions and Measurement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 112 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present experiment, most of the CH 4 emissions were recorded during the first week after application which is in line with others studies (Beck‐Friis, Pell, Sonesson, Jönsson, & Kirchmann, ; Sánchez et al, ; Sánchez‐Monedero, Serramiá, Civantos, Fernández‐Hernández, & Roig, ). For the EMU and FS treatments, 31%–60% of the annual cumulative CH 4 emissions were found during the first 21 days of the experiment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present experiment, most of the CH 4 emissions were recorded during the first week after application which is in line with others studies (Beck‐Friis, Pell, Sonesson, Jönsson, & Kirchmann, ; Sánchez et al, ; Sánchez‐Monedero, Serramiá, Civantos, Fernández‐Hernández, & Roig, ). For the EMU and FS treatments, 31%–60% of the annual cumulative CH 4 emissions were found during the first 21 days of the experiment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This could be due to the difference in the degrees of degradability of EFB compared to EMU, which might be coupled with the anaerobic conditions created by rainfall that ultimately favour the methanogenic archaea activity needed for CH 4 production (De Nobili, Contin, Mondini, & Brookes, ). The low emission from the EMU treatments maybe because it was already decomposed and available C was already stabilized/lost from the system (Sánchez et al, ). Thus, when monitoring CH 4 emissions from applied organic amendments, high intensity flux measurements should focus on the period up to 60 days after application, and less so on the period afterwards.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the variability in the emissions generated from windrow and tunnel composting systems, this may lead to an underestimation of the tunnel-based composting emissions. It is also important to note that tunnel-based composting emissions can be captured in biofilters which would reduce or eliminate this difference (Cadena et al 2009;Sánchez et al 2015); however, the surveys administered for this study did not query biofilter use, and thus filter use and related emissions abatement are not accounted for in the assessment.…”
Section: Compost Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Turning and aerating compost frequently will prevent anaerobic conditions and can reduce the CH 4 and N 2 O emissions created by the process (Saer et al 2013). The use of biofilters can also substantially reduce compost 2.49 × 10 emissions such as ammonia (Park et al 2002;Rosenfeld et al 2004;Sánchez et al 2015). Some composters have implemented biofilter technology, reducing their compost emissions impacts.…”
Section: Compost Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting knowledge is used to develop the optimal models for composting selected types of biological waste, to ensure that biological waste is fully sanitized, or to shorten composting time and maximize the performance of industrial equipment [13]. The following composting parameters are measured in a bioreactor: temperature, moisture content, aeration rate, and concentration of gases in exhaust air [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%