2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Greenhouse gas emissions of forest bioenergy supply and utilization in Finland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The GWP 100 of the three forest systems was approximately 3.7-3.8 g CO 2 -eq per MJ fuel, only including non-biogenic GHG emissions from forwarding, chipping, transportation, ash recycling and combustion. Previous studies have shown GWP in the range of 1.8-11 g CO 2 -eq MJ -1 fuel [20,19,55,10]. However, comparing results from different LCA studies are often problematic due to differences in system boundaries, functional unit and choice of allocation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The GWP 100 of the three forest systems was approximately 3.7-3.8 g CO 2 -eq per MJ fuel, only including non-biogenic GHG emissions from forwarding, chipping, transportation, ash recycling and combustion. Previous studies have shown GWP in the range of 1.8-11 g CO 2 -eq MJ -1 fuel [20,19,55,10]. However, comparing results from different LCA studies are often problematic due to differences in system boundaries, functional unit and choice of allocation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies of logging residues used for bioenergy have shown climate benefits in relation to fossil fuels [19][20][21]7,22]. In particular, the changes in soil organic carbon (SOC) and the CO 2 fluxes between soil, biomass and atmosphere have been shown to highly influence the result [23,20,[24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The type of wood fuel is of relevance for the life-cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. According to Jäppinen et al (2014), harvesting residues produce lower emissions than small-diameter energy wood, while stumps produce the most GHG emissions. This was explained by lower production-chain emissions and faster natural decay for harvesting residues.…”
Section: δComentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most homogenous chips can be produced from stemwood, while much more heterogeneous chips are produced from logging residues (Suadicani and Gamborg 1999). Impurities may prevent the use of stumps as feedstock, for example in the pyrolysis process, in which feedstock-purity requirements are generally higher than in combined heat and power production with fluidized bed boilers (Jäppinen et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%