Green Transitions and the Prevention of Environmental Disasters: Market-Based vs. Command-and-Control Policies

Abstract

The paper compares the effects of market-based (M-B) and command-and-control (C&C) climate policies on the direction of technical change and the prevention of environmental disasters. Drawing on a model of endogenous growth and directed technical change, we show that M-B policies (carbon taxes and subsidies toward clean sectors) suffer from path dependence and exhibit bounded window of opportunities: delays in their implementation make them ineffective both in redirecting technical change, (i.e. triggering a transition toward clean energy) and in avoiding environmental catastrophes. On the contrary, we find that C&C interventions are favored by path dependence and guarantee policy effectiveness irrespectively of the timing of their introduction. As the hypothesis of path dependence in technological change has received vast empirical support and it is a key feature of many models of growth, we argue that C&C policies should be seen as a valuable and non-equivalent alternative to M-B interventions.

Green merger and acquisition decision driven by environmental regulation and its impact on green innovation: evidence from Chinese heavily polluting listed enterprises

“…The prior literature has examined how heterogeneous ERs influence GI extensively (Dissou & Karnizova, 2016 ). Some scholars believed that CMCER could boost GI (Lamperti et al, 2020 ). As a mandatory constraint force, CMCER promotes innovation mainly through a reversal mechanism (Porter et al, 1995 ), while some scholars argued that CMCER was still a burden for enterprises (Peng et al, 2021 ), and the reversal mechanism did not stimulate enterprises to actively innovate and might not have a long-term effect on GI.…”

Why the US–China trade war spells disaster for the Amazon

“…But these can require considerable up-front investment from governments. Even then, such market-based policies are often insufficient to avert severe environmental degradation 14 .…”

The green transition: public policy, finance, and the role of the State

“…In addition, the price of fossil fuels influences the likelihood of a shift in a non-linear manner: small price variations have a low impact on inducing the transition, while moderate/high variations could increase both the likelihood, and the rate, of a green transition substantially. Furthermore, the burden of investments required by a transition should also account for adaptation investment and -assuming that climate change would affect the economy -that direct damages can erode or divert resources (Dietz et al 2016, Lamperti et al 2019a. It must be recognised, though, that such costs would be present also in a notransition, business-as-usual pathway.…”