“…2,29,[147][148][149][150][151][152][153][154][155][156] To date, most of the SCs (such as organic SCs, silicon based SCs, and dye/QD-sensitized SCs (DSSCs/QDSSCs)) are based on the use of toxic nanomaterials, with a lack of scalability, renewability and maximum power conversion efficiency. 2,29,[147][148][149][150][151][152][153][154][155][156] In this regard, the ecofriendly, inexpensive biomolecule-based C-QDs and G-QDs, with the scope of scalability and renewability and alluring optical features, have started to gain interest due to their different photovoltaic activities, such as sensitizers and photoabsorption agents (due to their absorption tail in the visible zone), charge carrier sources, and bridges and funnels (due to their large p-electron network (sp 2 core) and electron donating and accepting capability). 2,29,[147][148][149][150][151][152][153][154][155][156] Importantly, the use of man-made material-based C-QDs and G-QDs has been displayed to have applicability in developing heterojunction solar cells devices (ZnO QDs/G-QDs and CDs/Si: with enhanced absorption and suppressed recombination and thus higher efficiency compared to their parent components), open circuit voltage increment in devices (depending on the quantum size effect of the G-QDs), solution-processed organic/metal oxide and dyesensitized solar cells (such as combination of poly(3hexylthiophene) (P3HT) and GQDs, and TiO 2 with G-QDs and...…”