2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11276-015-1042-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Greedy–knapsack algorithm for optimal downlink resource allocation in LTE networks

Abstract: The Long Term Evolution (LTE) as a mobile broadband technology supports a wide domain of communication services with different requirements. Therefore, scheduling of all flows from various applications in overload states in which the requested amount of bandwidth exceeds the limited available spectrum resources is a challenging issue. Accordingly, in this paper, a greedy algorithm is presented to evaluate user candidates which are waiting for scheduling and select an optimal set of the users to maximize system… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference between the weighted and current transmission rate is considered as the gain in (13). If the current rate Ω (j, k) is higher than the weighted rate W i,j,k,l , there will be no gain for that particular user.…”
Section: Proposed Greedy-based Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The difference between the weighted and current transmission rate is considered as the gain in (13). If the current rate Ω (j, k) is higher than the weighted rate W i,j,k,l , there will be no gain for that particular user.…”
Section: Proposed Greedy-based Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Channel dependent packet schedulers are more accurate in real life scenarios as they consider more parameters than channel independent schedulers. Most of the previous researchers have used proportional fairness (PF) [5][6][7], Round Robin (RR) [8,9] and other algorithms [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] for resource allocation with CA in an LTE-A system. However, some important parameters, such as packet delay or error rate are not considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One can see in Table 4 that Voice (Vo) and Video streaming (Vi) are categorised as GB services, since they are delay sensitive and demanding almost constant data rates. Therefore, allocating capacities higher than the contracted ones will not improve their QoS [41]. On the other hand, an increase in the assigned data rate of Web browsing (We) and Email (Em) can indeed improve the users' quality of experience.…”
Section: Case Study Scenariomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding resource allocation, we can find this problem presented in [17] where a greedy-Knapsack algorithm for downlink resource allocation in LTE networks have been discussed. Also in [18], greedy algorithm was proposed for physical resource block allocation in multi-carrier wireless communications systems.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%