2012
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201218925
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GREAT/SOFIA atmospheric calibration

Abstract: The GREAT observations need frequency-selective calibration across the passband for the residual atmospheric opacity at flight altitude. At these altitudes the atmospheric opacity has both narrow and broad spectral features. To determine the atmospheric transmission at high spectral resolution, GREAT compares the observed atmospheric emission with atmospheric model predictions, and therefore depends on the validity of the atmospheric models. We discuss the problems identified in this comparison with respect to… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
103
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
103
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To improve the signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) the [C ii] and [N ii] data were smoothed to a velocity resolution of 1.20 km s −1 and 1.57 km s −1 per channel, respectively. The spectra were calibrated using the procedure outlined in Guan et al (2012).…”
Section: Sofia [C Ii] and [N Ii] Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To improve the signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) the [C ii] and [N ii] data were smoothed to a velocity resolution of 1.20 km s −1 and 1.57 km s −1 per channel, respectively. The spectra were calibrated using the procedure outlined in Guan et al (2012).…”
Section: Sofia [C Ii] and [N Ii] Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the position switching observing mode made the presence of this feature a significant issue that needed to be addressed in the data reduction. The standard atmospheric calibration was not sufficient to produce a satisfactory fit to the water feature, and we had to use a set of non-standard parameters in the atmospheric model (Guan et al 2012) to fit the width and the peak of the water line. The main change to the normal procedure was to reduce the contribution from the Dry atmosphere in steps, allowing the Wet part (water) to fit the atmospheric feature.…”
Section: Sofia [C Ii] and [N Ii] Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data were calibrated using standard procedures based on the KOSMA/GREAT calibrator (Guan et al 2012), for the data analysis the GILDAS 2 software was used. The forward efficiency was set to 95% and the data were converted to a RayleighJeans equivalent T mb,RJ scale using a beam efficiency of 51% for the L2 and 58% for the M band, respectively.…”
Section: Observation and Data Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calibration was performed with the standard pipeline (Guan et al 2012). Using the beam efficiency η c ≈ 0.51 and the forward efficiency (η f ) of 0.95 (Heyminck et al 2012), we converted all data to line brightness temperature scale, T B = η f × T * A /η c .…”
Section: Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%