2009
DOI: 10.1038/nature08445
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GRB 090423 at a redshift of z ≈ 8.1

Abstract: Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are produced by rare types of massive stellar explosion. Their rapidly fading afterglows are often bright enough at optical wavelengths that they are detectable at cosmological distances. Hitherto, the highest known redshift for a GRB was z = 6.7 (ref. 1), for GRB 080913, and for a galaxy was z = 6.96 (ref. 2). Here we report observations of GRB 090423 and the near-infrared spectroscopic measurement of its redshift, z = 8.1(-0.3)(+0.1). This burst happened when the Universe was only abo… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
425
2
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 451 publications
(444 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
16
425
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The column density derived from X-rays is about one order of magnitude higher than the column density of HI as derived from the optical of log N=21.14 (see Table 2). In fact, the X-ray column density is above the average for Swift GRBs but comparable to the mean for z > 4 GRBs of log N HX ∼ 22.5 following the trend of increasing column density with redshift (Campana et al, 2009). This is partly an observational effect (at higher redshifts, a larger column density is needed for it to even be detected) but probably also due to an increased in intervening absorbers contributing to the total absorbing column.…”
Section: Sed From X-ray To Irmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The column density derived from X-rays is about one order of magnitude higher than the column density of HI as derived from the optical of log N=21.14 (see Table 2). In fact, the X-ray column density is above the average for Swift GRBs but comparable to the mean for z > 4 GRBs of log N HX ∼ 22.5 following the trend of increasing column density with redshift (Campana et al, 2009). This is partly an observational effect (at higher redshifts, a larger column density is needed for it to even be detected) but probably also due to an increased in intervening absorbers contributing to the total absorbing column.…”
Section: Sed From X-ray To Irmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…8 (3.1% or 4.0% for Swift only) are at z > 5 of which 2 are photometric redshifts. The current records are z = 8.2 for GRB 090423A (spectroscopic, Salvaterra et al 2009;Tanvir et al 2009) and z = 9.4 for GRB 090429A (photometric, Cucchiara et al 2011), which makes them one of the farthest objects detected in the Universe. In the past, it had been estimated that a much larger fraction of GRBs might be observed at redshifts beyond 4 − 5 (Bromm & Loeb, 2002 and, taking into account the sensitivity of Swift, at least 10% should be at z>5.…”
Section: Grb 100219a In the Context Of High Redshift Galaxy Abundancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of them are so bright that they have been observed up to extremely high redshift (Salvaterra et al 2009;Tanvir et al 2009;Cucchiara et al 2011). In fact, different models (Bromm & Loeb 2002;Salvaterra & Chincarini 2007;de Souza et al 2011;Salvaterra et al 2012;Ghirlanda et al 2015;Elliott et al 2015) consistently predict that ∼ 3% of the GRBs detected by the Swift satellite should lie at z > 6.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are highly luminous, so they can be detected to much higher redshifts than optical supernovae; the current record holder is at z ≈ 8.2 (Tanvir et al, 2009;Salvaterra et al, 2009). GRBs are extremely diverse and highly beamed, but they exhibit correlations (Amati, 2006;Ghirlanda et al, 2006) between equivalent isotropic energy and spectral properties (such as the energy of peak intensity) or variability.…”
Section: Alternative Distance Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%