1992
DOI: 10.1080/00288233.1992.10417697
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grazing management of oversown tussock country

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Understanding the ecology of the species present is critical to predicting the effects of management on systems. This is true whether those systems are mediterranean‐type rangelands threatened with the replacement of productive perennial grasses by annual grasses (Kemp, Dowling & Michalk 1996), or tussock grasslands with a balance to be maintained between productive intertussock grasses and tussock grasses (Allan, O’Connor & White 1992), or arid systems where dwarf shrubs expand at the expense of perennial grasses at high grazing intensities (Bisigato & Bertiller 1997). As in all systems, stocking rate (as set by sward height in this case) is the most important variable in grazing management.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Understanding the ecology of the species present is critical to predicting the effects of management on systems. This is true whether those systems are mediterranean‐type rangelands threatened with the replacement of productive perennial grasses by annual grasses (Kemp, Dowling & Michalk 1996), or tussock grasslands with a balance to be maintained between productive intertussock grasses and tussock grasses (Allan, O’Connor & White 1992), or arid systems where dwarf shrubs expand at the expense of perennial grasses at high grazing intensities (Bisigato & Bertiller 1997). As in all systems, stocking rate (as set by sward height in this case) is the most important variable in grazing management.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With pasture development, in a tussock grassland environment, soil C levels have in most tr eatments at least been maintained or possibly increased. In the 2003 soil sampling higher soil C levels were found in the stock camp zones at the upper part of each paddock of all treatments, but an altitudinal trend had not been observed for soil C in 1984 (Allan 1985). In 2003, the lower stocking rate resulted in significantly higher soil C concentr ations (Ta ble 2), primarily because of high soil C levels in laxly grazed areas in the lowest altitudinal strata of some low stocking rate treatments.…”
Section: Tara Hills High Country Grazing Management Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Over all altitudes the stocking rate effect was most pronounced in the continuous grazing management treatment, with the highest soil C levels found in the low stocking rate continuous grazing treatment, and the lowest soil C levels in the overgrazed high stocking rate continuous treatment. Although an effect of stocking rate was apparent in an initial pre-treatment sampling of the continuous treatment plots in 1979, and in the 1984 results (Allan 1985) the magnitude of the effect has increased with time. Similar trends were observed in two samplings in 1997, particularly in the surface 10 cm, although the effect did not reach statistical significance (Stewart & Metherell 2001; Table 3).…”
Section: Tara Hills High Country Grazing Management Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations