2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2013.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gray matter contamination in arterial spin labeling white matter perfusion measurements in patients with dementia

Abstract: IntroductionWhite matter (WM) perfusion measurements with arterial spin labeling can be severely contaminated by gray matter (GM) perfusion signal, especially in the elderly. The current study investigates the spatial extent of GM contamination by comparing perfusion signal measured in the WM with signal measured outside the brain.Material and methodsFour minute 3T pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling scans were performed in 41 elderly subjects with cognitive impairment. Outward and inward geodesic distanc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…42,43 However, although current arterial spin-labeling techniques may be unable to measure WM CBF with high accuracy on a voxel-level, on an ROI level, as used in this study, it has been shown that WM CBF can be measured within a scanning time of as little as 5 minutes. [44][45][46] Our measurements were precise enough to measure significant differences in CBF between the NAWM and WMH and between the whole WM and the NAWM only. Moreover, the reliability of our findings is supported by the ratios between the GM, WM, NAWM, and WMH CBF, which are similar to those reported in studies in which exogenous contrast agents were used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…42,43 However, although current arterial spin-labeling techniques may be unable to measure WM CBF with high accuracy on a voxel-level, on an ROI level, as used in this study, it has been shown that WM CBF can be measured within a scanning time of as little as 5 minutes. [44][45][46] Our measurements were precise enough to measure significant differences in CBF between the NAWM and WMH and between the whole WM and the NAWM only. Moreover, the reliability of our findings is supported by the ratios between the GM, WM, NAWM, and WMH CBF, which are similar to those reported in studies in which exogenous contrast agents were used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…WM masks were threefold eroded to avoid GM contamination (Mutsaerts et al, 2013). ROIs of anterior, middle and posterior flow territories (supplied by the anterior, middle and posterior cerebral artery respectively) were created from standard vascular territory templates (Tatu et al, 1998) and ROIs associated with age-related dementia (anterior and posterior cingulate, precuneus) were created from the Wake Forest University Pick-atlas (http://fmri.wfubmc.edu/cms/software).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A GM perfusion map was calculated by multiplying the average perfusion mask by the participant’s binary GM tissue map. The WM perfusion map was calculated by applying a participant’s binary WM tissue map that was eroded with a 10-mm spherical kernel to reduce contamination of WM CBF due to partial voxel averaging to the average perfusion map (Mutsaerts et al 2013). Tract-wise ROIs from the JHU atlas were used to calculate average CBF WM and FA values along the spatial course of the twelve major WM tracts.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%