2015
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1501.00127
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gravitational wave astronomy with the SKA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
74
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The PTA will start to 'hit the signal' at much higher frequencies (f > 10 −8 Hz), where it is also likely to see individual sources and not only an unresolved GWB. We notice, nonetheless, that these numbers are quite less optimistic that those quoted in Janssen et al (2015). This is because, in that paper, both the GWB and single sources are said to be detectable if the produced S/N is larger than 4.…”
Section: Detection Probability As a Function Of Timementioning
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The PTA will start to 'hit the signal' at much higher frequencies (f > 10 −8 Hz), where it is also likely to see individual sources and not only an unresolved GWB. We notice, nonetheless, that these numbers are quite less optimistic that those quoted in Janssen et al (2015). This is because, in that paper, both the GWB and single sources are said to be detectable if the produced S/N is larger than 4.…”
Section: Detection Probability As a Function Of Timementioning
confidence: 68%
“…However, it turns out that this is not sufficiently stringent for claiming a confident detection of a single source. One should consider the results of this work as an update to those claimed in Janssen et al (2015), keeping in mind some important caveats related to the possible resolution of multiple sources that we will discuss in Section 4.…”
Section: Detection Probability As a Function Of Timementioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The gravitational wave signal of Set 1 is within the reach of future experiments such as LISA [64,65], DECIGO [66,67], and BBO [68][69][70]. For Set 2, the signal crosses the sensitivity bound of SKA [136][137][138] in addition to that of LISA, DECIGO, and BBO. FIG.…”
Section: Detectability Of Induced Gravitational Wavesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…1, we show the spectrum of GWs in terms of Ω gw • h 2 0 , where h 0 ≈ 0.7 is the dimensionless Hubble constant, for different Gµ l and f peak . We compare it with the sensitivity of current and future detectors: LIGO [24,25], Einstein Telescope (ET) [26], Cosmic Explorer (CE) [27], DECIGO [28], LISA [29,30], and PTAs [6,31,32]. For the peak frequency lying in the ranges 10 −9 Hz f peak 10 −7 Hz and 10 −5 Hz f peak 100 Hz, one will be able to probe melting strings with an initial tension as large as Gµ l 10 −6 .…”
Section: Prospects For Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%