1993
DOI: 10.1086/172299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gravitational microlensing - The effect of random motion of individual stars in the lensing galaxy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
69
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
7
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The A component w as active (Kundic et al 1995), and also, we have not found evidences of strong microlensing in the r R comparison (Oscoz et al 1997, Goicoechea et al 1998. A similar result (417 3 days; 2 con dence level) has been derived by Kundic et al (1997).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The A component w as active (Kundic et al 1995), and also, we have not found evidences of strong microlensing in the r R comparison (Oscoz et al 1997, Goicoechea et al 1998. A similar result (417 3 days; 2 con dence level) has been derived by Kundic et al (1997).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The direction is set to be the same in both patterns because the shear direction between images A and B is approximately the same (Witt & Mao 1994), and because we assume the motion of the source to be primarily due to the bulk motion of the lensing galaxy rather than to the individual motions of the stars. Kundic & Wambsganss (1993) and Wambsganss & Kundic (1995) show that the velocity dispersion of the stars can statistically be interpreted as a bulk velocity artificially increased by an efficiency factor a 1.3.…”
Section: Microlensing Simulations Fitting the Ogle Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effective transverse velocity is the result of the relative motion between the source, the lens and the observer (Kayser et al 1986), and is enhanced by a contribution from the velocity dispersion of the stars in the lensing galaxy (Kundic & Wambsganss 1993;Wambsganss & Kundic 1995). The problem is that we do not known the peculiar velocity of either the source, or the lens.…”
Section: Bayesian Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The statistics of time delays has a rich history (e.g., Press et al 1992a,b;Pelt et al 1994Pelt et al , 1996, driven in part by the difficulty in obtaining a clean delay from Q0957+561 (the first lensed quasar discovered) until a sharp feature was finally seen in the light curves (Kundić et al 1995(Kundić et al , 1997. Most lens monitoring campaigns do not obtain regular sampling; dealing properly with unevenly sampled data is a crucial part of a successful light curve analysis.…”
Section: H 0 and The Practicalities Of Time Delay Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%