2008
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:200810729
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microlensing variability in the gravitationally lensed quasar QSO 2237+0305 $\mathsf{\equiv}$ the Einstein Cross

Abstract: We present the continuation of our long-term spectroscopic monitoring of the gravitationally lensed quasar QSO 2237+0305. We investigate the chromatic variations observed in the UV/optical continuum of both quasar images A and B, and compare them with numerical simulations to infer the energy profile of the quasar accretion disk. Our procedure combines the microlensing ray-shooting technique with Bayesian analysis, and derives probability distributions for the source sizes as a function of wavelength. We find … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

21
133
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(155 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(77 reference statements)
21
133
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These values agree with the radii obtained for the lensed quasars HE1104−1805 and Q2237+0305 on the basis of their photometric variability due to microlensing (e.g. Poindexter et al 2008;Eigenbrod et al 2008;Anguita et al 2008b).…”
Section: Microlensing Of the Continuum Sourcesupporting
confidence: 88%
“…These values agree with the radii obtained for the lensed quasars HE1104−1805 and Q2237+0305 on the basis of their photometric variability due to microlensing (e.g. Poindexter et al 2008;Eigenbrod et al 2008;Anguita et al 2008b).…”
Section: Microlensing Of the Continuum Sourcesupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The maximum likelihood estimate corresponds to = áñ lt-day. However, studies of high-magnification events are likely biased toward small quasar size estimates because it is easier to obtain high magnifications with small sources (e.g., Kochanek 2004;Eigenbrod et al 2008;Blackburne et al 2011). It is also interesting to note that without considering any velocity prior (i.e., adopting a uniform prior), the size determinations of Eigenbrod et al (2008) and Anguita et al (2008) increase by a factor ∼4 (see Sluse et al 2011) but would then require cosmologically unrealistic peculiar velocities for the lens/source.…”
Section: The Observed Magnitude Of Image I=(a B C D) Ismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The blue filled square is our Bayesian estimate for the expected value of R 1/2 and p for the hybrid model (the values for the Gaussian and thin disk models are also plotted as green and red filled squares respectively for comparison). The open (filled) circle corresponds to the measurement by Eigenbrod et al (2008) with (without) a velocity prior. Straight lines correspond to the measurements by Poindexter & Kochanek (2010b) …”
Section: The Observed Magnitude Of Image I=(a B C D) Ismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The microlensing effect on the multiple quasar images, induced by stars in the deflector, provides a quantitative handle on the stellar content of the lens galaxies (e.g., Schechter & Wambsganss 2002;Oguri, Rusu & Falco 2014;Schechter et al 2014;Jiménez-Vicente et al 2015), and can simultaneously provide constraints on the inner structure of the lensed quasar, both the accretion disk size and the thermal profile (e.g. Poindexter, Morgan & Kochanek 2008;Anguita et al 2008;Eigenbrod et al 2008;Motta et al 2012) as well as the geometry of the broad line region (e.g. Sluse et al 2011, Guerras et al 2013, Braibant et al 2014.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%