2013
DOI: 10.3402/qhw.v8i0.20634
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grasping the experience of the other from an interview: Self-transposition in use

Abstract: This article describes a part of the interview process that is never usually reported. Listening to what people say is the key to increasing our knowledge of human existences. Procuring knowledge about human experience is much more challenging. Although good sources on how to prepare and conduct an interview exist, the process of the interviewer's perception of the interviewee's message and meaning is less examined. Beyond the role of eliciting the data, the researcher endeavours to reproduce the interviewee's… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, both researchers in the in-depth interview studies were acquainted with feelings of guilt, and were touched deeply by the participants’ stories. It is claimed that it is necessary to be deeply absorbed by the participants’ expressions and empathically touched by participants’ to, at least partly, understand what might be at stake in the life-worlds of participants (Angel, 2013 ), and that such absorption is also paramount to ethically sound research (Malacrida, 2007 ). However, had we triggered reactions that could add to the women's burden in the long run?…”
Section: Knowledge Positions and Researcher Vulnerability—shifts And mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, both researchers in the in-depth interview studies were acquainted with feelings of guilt, and were touched deeply by the participants’ stories. It is claimed that it is necessary to be deeply absorbed by the participants’ expressions and empathically touched by participants’ to, at least partly, understand what might be at stake in the life-worlds of participants (Angel, 2013 ), and that such absorption is also paramount to ethically sound research (Malacrida, 2007 ). However, had we triggered reactions that could add to the women's burden in the long run?…”
Section: Knowledge Positions and Researcher Vulnerability—shifts And mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Openness in the interview situation, in the context of phenomenological research, is described as concerning not only listening to the spoken words in search of meaning, but also as possessing the ability to deeply absorb the interviewees’ expressions with both mind and body (Angel, 2013 ). Given the notion of the open-minded approach, awareness towards the importance of not taking over the conversation, but rather letting the patients tell their stories, and freely express the meanings they assigned to the phenomena of interest, was in focus.…”
Section: The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This attitude was achieved by creating a relaxed atmosphere using friendly and approachable body language (Fog, 2004 ). Senses and intuition were used in the interview to decide when to ask the patients to elaborate on their statements, to ask follow-up questions or to let silence and pauses take over (Angel, 2013 ).…”
Section: The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Questions regarding confidentiality and the option of refusing to answer questions were repeated, and after the interview, debriefing was carried out [47]. Knowing participants from three former interviews and recognizing their vulnerability special awareness was directed towards recognizing participants´sign of discomfort or aversion [48].…”
Section: Supplementary Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%