Researcher–researched relationship in qualitative research: Shifts in positions and researcher vulnerability

Abstract

BackgroundThe researcher role is highly debated in qualitative research. This article concerns the researcher-researched relationship.MethodsA group of health science researchers anchored in various qualitative research traditions gathered in reflective group discussions over a period of two years.ResultsEfforts to establish an anti-authoritarian relationship between researcher and researched, negotiation of who actually “rules” the research agenda, and experiences of shifts in “inferior” and “superior” knowledge positions emerged as central and intertwined themes throughout the discussions. The dual role as both insider and outsider, characteristic of qualitative approaches, seemed to lead to power relations and researcher vulnerability which manifested in tangible ways.ConclusionShifting positions and vulnerability surfaced in various ways in the projects. They nonetheless indicated a number of similar experiences which can shed light on the researcher-researched relationship. These issues could benefit from further discussion in the qualitative health research literature.

The personal motif in naturalistic case study research: developing “innerstandings” in woman’s compulsive behaviour

“…We did not have the OCD label, but recognized underlying patterns in our lives and work. So as researchers we interacted intensively with the case on a personal level to come to a meaningful understanding of the case (Råheim et al, 2016). This required more "proximity" than we are used to in qualitative research and a distancing from a clinical-reductionist way of looking as well as letting our innerstandings breathe.…”

“…As in other qualitative research, the position of the researcher is important in "what is seen" and whatnot, how s/he looks and what is noticed (Entman, 1993;. Critical reflexivity is, therefore, part of naturalistic case study research in order to be transparent about one's subject position and relational dynamics between researcher and researched (Råheim et al, 2016). Yet certain things are hard to see when we are untrained, when we are silenced about aspects of the self (e.g., gender issues such as the expression of gendered emotions or experiences), when we are trained into perceiving phenomena a certain way or into not perceiving phenomena (doing gender) (Ahmed, 2017;Butler, 1990).…”

‘You have to keep your head on your shoulders’: A systems psychodynamic perspective on women leaders

“…The concept of Dilthey's (2002) modern hermeneutics was used to create 'verstehen' (understanding) from an in-depth perspective of the CIBART model. To construct, analyse and interpret the data, researchers used a self-reflective attitude, as described by Ratner (2002), whilst the 'privileged position of the researcher vis-à-vis the researched' is strongly emphasised (Raheim et al, 2016).…”

Effective Strategies Small Retail Leaders Use to Engage Employees

“…Qualitative inquiry allows a researcher with prior knowledge of the topic to provide relevant understanding to the situation (Male, 2016). The researcher-participant relationship requires an anti-authoritarian connection between the two parties and a minimization of distance within that relationship (Råheim et al, 2016). Olsen, Lehto, and Chan (2016) noted that a researcher should build a trusting relationship with participants.…”