2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2015.09.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Graphitic carbon nitrides modified hollow fiber solid phase microextraction for extraction and determination of uric acid in urine and serum coupled with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(55 reference statements)
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We compared the results of various methods for the determination of concentration of the five analytes in serum (Table S5 ). In general, the concentrations of AA, DA, UA, and Trp are closer to those obtained by CL 60 , HPLC-CL 61 , GC/MS 62 , and UV methods 63 ; however, the concentration of NO 2 ˉ is significantly higher than that measured by the spectrophotometric methods in the ref. 64 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…We compared the results of various methods for the determination of concentration of the five analytes in serum (Table S5 ). In general, the concentrations of AA, DA, UA, and Trp are closer to those obtained by CL 60 , HPLC-CL 61 , GC/MS 62 , and UV methods 63 ; however, the concentration of NO 2 ˉ is significantly higher than that measured by the spectrophotometric methods in the ref. 64 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Indeed, various carbon-based extraction phases, which have been discussed in detail under the Coatings section, have been reported to date for the abovementioned applications, including electrochemically reduced graphene oxide, graphene-based nanocomposites, and graphitic carbon nitrides immobilized in hollow fiber wall pores. Such carbon-based coatings have been used for extraction of analytes such as tricyclic antidepressants (via HS) and uric acid (via DI and after solvent desorption and derivatization) in different biofluids prior to GC analysis. Sol–gel based extraction phases with functionalities such as β-cyclodextrin, polyethylene glycol, and methacrylic acid have also been proposed as mechanically stable coatings capable of facilitating the extraction of polar compounds from urine and serum samples. , Despite the promising results provided by such coating chemistries in selected applications, their applicability in novel SPME studies is somewhat limited by the fact that such materials are mostly made in-house, and therefore, are not easily available for evaluations in new applications. In addition to the employment of alternative coatings, alternative strategies have also been reported to date in bioanalytical applications, such as the use of an electromembrane (EM) to facilitate the analysis of complex biological matrixes via DI .…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…UA is enzymatically hydrolyzed to produce allantoin and hydrogen peroxide, after which the detection of UA is indirectly achieved by determining the content of hydrogen peroxide . Although it is widely used, this method still has many limitations, e.g., the interference from other biological analytes (ascorbate, bilirubin), long incubation time (∼30 min), strict pH conditions, expensive enzyme, and low determination accuracy. , So far, some methods have been reported to directly detect UA to avoid the shortcomings of enzyme-based assays, such as high-performance liquid chromatography, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), electrochemistry, and fluorescence . Among them, fluorescence analysis is a very effective method because of the advantages of rapidness, high selectivity and sensitivity, convenience, and low cost. Until now, only a handful of fluorescent sensors for direct UA detection have been developed including carbon dots, quantum dots, polymers, and metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Although it is widely used, this method still has many limitations, e.g., the interference from other biological analytes (ascorbate, bilirubin), long incubation time (∼30 min), strict pH conditions, expensive enzyme, and low determination accuracy. 7,8 So far, some methods have been reported to directly detect UA to avoid the shortcomings of enzyme-based assays, such as high-performance liquid chromatography, 9 gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), 10 electrochemistry, 11 and fluorescence. 12 Among them, fluorescence analysis is a very effective method because of the advantages of rapidness, high selectivity and sensitivity, convenience, and low cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%