2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2012.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Graphene quantum dots as a new substrate for immobilization and direct electrochemistry of glucose oxidase: Application to sensitive glucose determination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
125
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 291 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
125
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Especially, the emission from carbon dots could be efficiently quenched by either electron acceptor or donor molecules in solution, indicating that the photo-excited carbon dots are excellent as both electron donors and electron acceptors. Therefore, unlike the common carbon material, carbon dot with small size, provide high electrocatalytic activity owing to the large surface area [33][34][35], but they lower electron transport efficiency owing to the oxygen-rich functional groups, abundant grain boundaries, and defects [36]. This suggests the single carbon dots as the electrode material is not a good choice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Especially, the emission from carbon dots could be efficiently quenched by either electron acceptor or donor molecules in solution, indicating that the photo-excited carbon dots are excellent as both electron donors and electron acceptors. Therefore, unlike the common carbon material, carbon dot with small size, provide high electrocatalytic activity owing to the large surface area [33][34][35], but they lower electron transport efficiency owing to the oxygen-rich functional groups, abundant grain boundaries, and defects [36]. This suggests the single carbon dots as the electrode material is not a good choice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…5a, blue dot line) is 476 Ω, ten times of that of NS-C, which suggests that the NS-C is more favorable for interfacial electron transfer of the redox probe and has a faster electron transfer rate [17]. This can be possibly explained by that the additional N/S-doping in NS-C creates asymmetrical spin and charge density owing to the synergetic effect of N and S atoms [50], which further facilitates the interfacial electron transfer of the redox probe to electrode.…”
Section: Science China Materialsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…, and the detection limit was calculated to be 1.73 μmol L −1 with a sensitivity of 0.085 μA cm −2 μmol −1 L [17]. By contrast with graphene nanosheets modified GCE electrode [18] and acetylene black modified GCE electrode [19], the HTC based electrodes have less unbound electron, larger transfer resistance in the electrochemical impedance spectra and result in poor sensitivity when applied in biosensors [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many nanomaterials, such as carbon nanotubes [5,18], gold nanoparticles [19,20], and metal oxides [21,22] have been used in biosensors. More recently a new class of carbon material, graphene, which is a twodimensional sheet of carbon atoms, has attracted increasing attention with respect to its potential applications in phtoelectronic devices, supercapacitors, sensors and nanocomposites applications [6,[23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. Due to their planar morphology and thus larger accessible surface area, graphene may perform better than any other carbon-based materials for an electrode sensor fabrication.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%