2022
DOI: 10.1109/tcbb.2020.2999084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Graph Convolutional Autoencoder and Generative Adversarial Network-Based Method for Predicting Drug-Target Interactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the AUC and AUPR are usually adequate metrics for evaluating the performance of a model for DTI prediction [ 40 ]. Many similar studies have used these two metrics to evaluate the performance of methods for predicting DTIs [ 26 , 28 , 41 43 ]. As biologists often select drug-target pairs with high prediction scores for subsequent wet experiment validation, the recall rates of the top (5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, and 30%) proportion of candidate targets predicted by the model were selected.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, the AUC and AUPR are usually adequate metrics for evaluating the performance of a model for DTI prediction [ 40 ]. Many similar studies have used these two metrics to evaluate the performance of methods for predicting DTIs [ 26 , 28 , 41 43 ]. As biologists often select drug-target pairs with high prediction scores for subsequent wet experiment validation, the recall rates of the top (5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, and 30%) proportion of candidate targets predicted by the model were selected.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To further evaluate the performance of SDGAE, we compared it with several other state-of-the-art methods, including GRMF [ 8 ], DTINet [ 9 ], GANDTI [ 28 ], NGDTP [ 7 ], MolTrans [ 19 ], and GADTI [ 26 ]. The hyperparameters of these methods were selected based on ranges recommended in the literature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The generative adversarial network was utilized to regulate the encoder so that the low dimensional feature vector generated by the encoder is followed the Gaussian distribution to ensure the feature vector's robustness. In terms of DTI prediction, the model adopts an integrated learning method and used the drugs and target proteins' low dimensional features to predict the interaction possibility [5]. The prediction method based on molecular sequence (such as AEFS) ignores the similarity relationship between drugs (or targets), and the prediction method based on heterogeneous network structure (such as GRMF, DDR) ignores the attributes of nodes themselves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method WideDTA [20] adapts the word-based sequence representation for compounds and proteins, and utilizes two extra features LMCS (ligand max common structures) and PDM (protein motifs and domains) to improve model performance and prediction accuracy. From the perspective that compound structure is regarded as molecular graph, the methods CPI-GNN [21] and Graph-DTA [22] use graph neural networks (GNNs) [23], [24] and graph convolutional neural networks (GCNs) [25] to learn representation of compounds, the model GANDTI integrates a graph convolutional autoencoder and generative adversarial network (GAN) to deeply learn the feature vectors for drugs and targets [26]. Regarding both compounds and proteins as sequence data, recurrent neural networks (RNNs) are used to extract feature vectors of compounds and proteins in DeepAffinity [27] and Zheng's work [28].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%