2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2007.00971.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Granulocyte transfusions for neutropenic patients with life‐threatening infections: a single centre experience in 47 patients, who received 348 granulocyte transfusions

Abstract: GTs are safe and should be considered for patients with life-threatening neutropenic infections. However, prospective randomized studies of GTs are the only way to establish the true role of GTs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
43
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
6
43
1
Order By: Relevance
“…17 Recent studies of therapeutic granulocyte transfusions for neutropenic infections in patients with leukemia and/or undergoing HSCT have shown survival rates of 31-81%; in patients with invasive fungal infections, the survival rates range from 20-80%. These studies, summarized in Table 4, [1][2][3][4][5][6][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] vary in the definition of invasive fungal infections, the timing of initiating granulocyte therapy, the cell dose of granulocytes transfused, and the number of granulocyte doses given. One study was randomized, but only 60% of patients were actually neutropenic prior to receiving granulocytes, and 44% of patients randomized to the granulocyte arm received only one or two transfusions before neutrophil recovery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 Recent studies of therapeutic granulocyte transfusions for neutropenic infections in patients with leukemia and/or undergoing HSCT have shown survival rates of 31-81%; in patients with invasive fungal infections, the survival rates range from 20-80%. These studies, summarized in Table 4, [1][2][3][4][5][6][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] vary in the definition of invasive fungal infections, the timing of initiating granulocyte therapy, the cell dose of granulocytes transfused, and the number of granulocyte doses given. One study was randomized, but only 60% of patients were actually neutropenic prior to receiving granulocytes, and 44% of patients randomized to the granulocyte arm received only one or two transfusions before neutrophil recovery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Granulocyte transfusions have long been recognized as a potential therapeutic option for treating infections in individuals with neutropenia [6,38,39]. Nonetheless, the use of granulocyte transfusions has remained infrequent and only about 1000 granulocyte units are transfused per year in the US [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ofran et al [11] showed that a sustained increase in neutrophil count following GTX's ([700 cells/ll) was the only independent prognostic factor for infection-related survival. This observation might reflect a 'favorable' subgroup of patients, whose granulocyte consumption was modest due to a less severe infection that therefore attained a sustained 'high' neutrophil count.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Several recent clinical studies have shown clinical benefits of GTX in HSCT recipients with severe bacterial or fungal infections [7,10,11]. Patients with active invasive fungal infections with a very high risk primary disease without HSCT received antifungal agents combined with GTX and the results were presented retrospectively.…”
Section: A Resistant Severe Clinical Infection In a Neutropenicmentioning
confidence: 99%