‘Grand Theft South Africa’: games, literacy and inequality in consumer childhoods

Abstract

Discussions of 'game literacy' focus on the informal learning and literacies associated with games but seldom address the diversity in young people's gaming practices, and the highly differentiated technologies of digital gaming in use. We use available survey data to show how, in South Africa, income inequalities influence consumption patterns, shaping experiences of digital games. Two case studies of young people's play practices involving digital games in Cape Town suggest the fragmentation and inequalities of contemporary play practices and the need for a more inclusive understanding of digital gaming. Mobile phones offer more accessibility than other digital gaming platforms and local appropriations include display of micro-commodities, concealment of outdated technology, control strategies and deletion of functionality. Young people move between multiple overlapping communicative spaces and hence complex cultural articulations arise when global game narratives are appropriated to make sense of racial otherness, crime and politics in South Africa. Since educational curricula cater for highly fractured publics, we ask whether it is advisable to speak of 'game literacy'. We suggest the need to validate less strongly mediatised forms of play, and to address diverse identification practices in consumer culture, including prestige and status as well as othering and shame.

Your Phone Has Internet - Why Are You at a Library PC? Re-imagining Public Access in the Mobile Internet Era

“…Market research suggests that 9 million unique users subscribe to the GPRS data channel [19]. Meanwhile MXit, a Java-based GPRS "internet-lite" chat application, has become popular enough, as a first-time mobile internet experience, to spawn moral panics, new phrases, and political sagas [20][21][22][23][24]. Thus "mobile centric" [25] internet use is increasingly prevalent, particularly in urban areas and among youth [26,27].…”

Why Play? Examining the Roles of Play in ICTD

“…Roger Caillois categorizes play within four different types [13], building on the Greek terms: (1) Agon, referring to games of a competitive nature, (2) Alea, pertaining to games of chance, such as casino games, (3) Mimesis, referring to role playing and (4) Ilinx, which encompass aspects of extreme sports that provide adrenaline rushes and even taking hallucinogenic substances or riding rollercoasters. Games are one of the most extensively studied forms of play, both in academia in general [13,40,81], as well as around technology more specifically [42,52,69,83]. We discuss games throughout, in the common, everyday understanding of the term, encompassing all these different forms.…”

Decolonising the Games Curriculum: Interventions in an Introductory Game Design Course

“…This has far-reaching implications for the games industry in South Africa, which is overwhelmingly dominated by white males (Hall, 2015). Games are seen as a luxury, with the vast potential they present obscured by the assumption that they belong to an elite upper class (Walton & Pallitt, 2012). This perception is compounded by the severe socio-economic difficulties of entering the fledgeling industry.…”

“…Modes of thought and practice, embedded in the discourse, are more penetrable to students who are prolific game players, and are still not sufficiently modelled for and made explicit to novice players (Middendorf & Pace, 2004;Zagal & Bruckman, 2008). In the South African context, with its complex economic and racial dynamics, this effectively excludes many black students (Walton & Pallitt, 2012).…”