2019
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-019-01652-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grammatical gender and linguistic relativity: A systematic review

Abstract: Many languages assign nouns to a grammatical gender class, such that "bed" might be assigned masculine gender in one language (e.g., Italian) but feminine gender in another (e.g., Spanish). In the context of research assessing the potential for language to influence thought (the linguistic relativity hypothesis), a number of scholars have investigated whether grammatical gender assignment "rubs off" on concepts themselves, such that Italian speakers might conceptualize beds as more masculine than Spanish speak… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
2
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is known that when a noun is comprehended, corresponding grammatical information is activated (Meyer, Belke, Telling, & Humphreys, 2007;Pulvermüller & Shtyrov, 2003). It is therefore possible that previous effects are due to grammatical activation, rather than reflecting conceptual similarities between objects sharing a classifier (a similar proposal has been made for effects of grammatical gender; Ramos & Roberson, 2011;Samuel et al, 2019;Vigliocco et al, 2005). Specifically, if two objects are labeled by participants and this activates the same grammatical marker, they may be judged as more similar.…”
Section: Classifiers Rflect Conceptual Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that when a noun is comprehended, corresponding grammatical information is activated (Meyer, Belke, Telling, & Humphreys, 2007;Pulvermüller & Shtyrov, 2003). It is therefore possible that previous effects are due to grammatical activation, rather than reflecting conceptual similarities between objects sharing a classifier (a similar proposal has been made for effects of grammatical gender; Ramos & Roberson, 2011;Samuel et al, 2019;Vigliocco et al, 2005). Specifically, if two objects are labeled by participants and this activates the same grammatical marker, they may be judged as more similar.…”
Section: Classifiers Rflect Conceptual Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Spanish and French adults and children tend to assign feminine and masculine voices to objects according to the grammatical gender of the objects in their native languages (Sera et al, 2002), and Spanish and German speakers remember noun-object pairings better when the noun of the object matches the grammatical gender of the object in their language (Boroditsky, Schmidt, & Phillips, 2003). A recent systematic review of the literature on grammatical gender and linguistic relativity suggests that grammatical gender effects on thought are task-specific and modulated by several factors (Samuel, Cole, & Eacott, 2019).…”
Section: I S G E N D E R a N Abstract C O N C E P T ?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, we predicted that there would be no age-related differences in performance between the two groups, because in children with DLD, language impairment has usually been found to be only marginally related to age (Leonard, 2014). In addition, we believe research on grammatical gender representation across languages is a timely and under investigated research topic that deserves attention (see the recent review by Samuel et al, 2019).…”
Section: The Current Studymentioning
confidence: 99%