Grammatical and Lexical Patterning of Make in Asian Learner Writing: A Corpus-Based Study of ICNALE

Abstract

This study investigates lexical and grammatical features of the high-frequency verb "make" in English written essays among Asian English as a foreign language (EFL) learners based on the ICNALE, the largest corpora focusing on various Asian learner groups. Examining how lexical and grammatical patterning of "make" differ between English native speakers (ENSs) and Asian learners from different countries, this study investigates overuse and misuse patterns of "make" and how they correlate to proficiency. Results show that all Asian learner groups shared similar tendency to use "make" substantially more than ENSs, with producing and causative uses most common and delexical use least common. However, Asian learners tend to produce fewer varieties of delexical uses compared with ENSs. The adjective and verb complements in the causative category by Asian learners also differ from that of ENSs. Rates and types of misuses by Taiwanese learners were independent of proficiency. It is also evident that the high-frequency verb "make" expresses a variety of meanings and there are differences in lexical as well as grammatical patterning between Taiwanese learners and ENSs. Pedagogical implications regarding the use of high-frequency verbs are included in the discussion.

A Case Study of L1 Interference in Speech Acts among Chinese L2 Students

“…What was "heavy" and how does it relate to sickness which happened "before"? A study by Lin and Lin (2019) found that Taiwanese learners of different proficiency levels were found to over-rely on basic meaning of words and lack collocation use. Hence it is proposed learners should be exposed to corpus resources of real world English throughout their EFL education in order to understand the relationship between the linguistic forms and their communicative functions.…”

Lexical Richness of Abstracts in Scientific Papers in Anglophone and Non-Anglophone Journals

“…Accordingly, the organization of ideas and the flow of writing, in a certain way, are determined by writers' unawareness of the rhetoric, limited vocabulary, and lack of native-like fluency (Bahtiar et al, 2020), which leads to having a messy and unclear linguistic and academic production of texts. That is why differences emerge, particularly in lexical and grammatical patterning (Lin & Lin, 2019) across texts in both academic discourses.…”

Accent in Digital Humanities and Language Studies: The Case in Hong Kong

“…To facilitate this objective, the notion of DH accent is essential in guiding instructors and scholars in their curriculum. In fact, there is an upward trend of integrating DH in English studies in Asian EFL context and studies present a promising picture that localised DH applications benefit Asian students in their English studies (Hamat & Hassan, 2019;Lin & Lin, 2019). To further illustrate our claim, m ore examples from our own experience will be provided in section 4.…”